About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FCA Highlights Good and Bad Practice Across Five Areas of Algorithmic Trading

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a report on the supervision of algorithmic trading that focuses on five areas of algo trading compliance and highlights good and bad practice observed from cross-firm reviews.

The FCA report coincides with publication of a consultation paper by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) on proposed expectations regarding a firm’s governance and risk management of algorithmic trading. The FCA and PRA will work together to ensure a coordinated approach going forward.

The FCA report considers the use of algorithms for a number of purposes across trading activity, including Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II. It notes that while automated technology brings significant benefits to investors, including increased execution speed and reduced costs, it can also amplify risk, making it essential that key oversight functions, including compliance and risk management, keep pace with technological advancements.

The five areas of focus and key objectives, based on the FCA’s review findings, and with consideration of MIFID II requirements, cover:

  • Defining algorithmic trading
    Key objective: To ensure firms establish an appropriate process to identify algorithmic trading, manage material changes and maintain a comprehensive inventory of algorithmic trading across the business
  • Development and testing
    Key objective: To ensure firms maintain robust, consistent and well understood development and testing processes that identify potential issues across trading algorithms prior to full deployment
  • Risk controls
    Key objective: To ensure firms develop suitable and robust pre- and post-trade controls to monitor, identify and reduce potential trading risks across algorithmic trading activity
  • Governance and oversight
    Key objective: To ensure firms maintain an appropriate governance and oversight framework that demonstrates effective challenge from senior management, risk management and compliance on algorithmic trading activities
  • Market conduct
    Key objective: To ensure firms appropriately consider the potential impact of their algorithmic trading on market integrity, monitor for potential conduct issues and reduce market abuse risks.

Megan Butler, director of supervision, investment, wholesale and specialist, at the FCA, says: “This report is relevant for all firms developing and using algorithmic trading strategies in wholesale markets. Firms should consider and act on its content in the context of good practice for their business.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Navigating the Build vs Buy Dilemma: Cloud Strategies for Accelerating Quantitative Research

Date: 20 May 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes For many quantitative trading firms and asset managers, building a self-provisioned historical market data environment remains one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps in establishing a new research capability. Sourcing data, normalising symbologies, handling corporate actions and maintaining...

BLOG

Banks Should Optimise Collateral in 2026 to Lay the Groundwork for Greater Efficiency and Innovation

By James Pike, Chief Revenue Officer and Head of Strategy, Taskize. Collateral teams have been tested in 2025. Banks have weathered multiple bouts of high volatility, including the fallout from ‘Liberation Day’ and sell-offs over fears of a possible AI bubble. Sharp spikes in volatility across multiple asset classes have the potential to disrupt collateral...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

Putting the LEI into Practice

Hundreds of thousands of pre-Legal Entity Identifiers (LEIs) have been issued by pre-Local Operating Units (LOUs) in the Global LEI System (GLEIS), and the standard entity identifier has been mandated for use by regulators in both the US and Europe. As more pre-LEIs are issued ahead of the establishment of the global systems’ Central Operating...