About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FASB to Vote on Controversial Fair Value Proposals on 2 April

Subscribe to our newsletter

Following the heavy criticism that has been levelled at the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for its failure to act on issues with fair value accounting standards, the industry body has indicated that it is now preparing for the final vote on its proposals, which were announced on 16 March. The FASB will be carrying out the vote on 2 April and they are then due to come into force for financial statements released at the end of the first quarter.

The new rules will allow firms “significant judgement” in the valuation of their assets and are considered to be a major step away from the original mark to market guidelines. It is expected that the relaxation of the accounting rules will result in an increase in banks’ profits of up to 20% due the reduction in the writedowns on their balance sheets. These financial institutions can now use internal models instead of market prices to value their hard to value assets.

FASB was forced to revise its mark to market legislation following pressure from lobbying efforts by the US Chamber of Commerce, the American Bankers Association (ABA) and the larger financial institutions. Moreover, on 12 March, the FASB was threatened with government action during a hearing of a House Financial Services subcommittee. Government officials told Robert Herz, chairman of the FASB, to get the rule changes implemented in a period of three weeks or face regulatory intervention.

The revisions have also come under criticism for their perceived lack of transparency and the manner in which the FASB was forced to back down by lobbyists and politicians. However, the accounting body has defended its actions and spokesman Neal McGarity has recently stated that it merely expedited the rule changes rather than bowing to pressure in terms of the content of the changes themselves.

It is also feared that the new rules will interfere with US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s plan to remove distressed assets from bank balance sheets by discouraging financial institutions from disposing of these assets.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

The Case Against Ripping and Replacing: Why Capital Markets Firms Should Build Intelligence Into What They Already Have

By Neil Vernon, Chief Product Officer, Gresham. For years, capital markets firms have faced the same challenge: modernising sprawling, legacy data systems. Each attempt follows a familiar pattern – ambitious platform overhauls, eight-figure budgets, years of disruption – yet the old systems often remain in use long after the new ones are live. Replacing systems...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, Spring, New York, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 9th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

MiFID II Handbook – Second Edition

With the compliance deadline for Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) just over two months away, A-Team Group has updated its MiFID II handbook to bring you the latest details on the regulation’s compliance requirements. Version 2 of the handbook, commissioned by Thomson Reuters, also includes new sections covering data sourcing and data...