The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

DTCC Announces Intention to Establish European-based Derivatives Trade Reporting Repository

The subject of a European-based trade repository for the credit default swap market has long been a bone of contention between regulators and industry participants in the derivatives market, but it seems that the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) is hoping to solve the issue by setting up a new subsidiary on European shores for the market. The DTCC Derivatives Repository Limited will therefore maintain global credit default swap data identical to that maintained in its New York-based trade repository, the Trade Information Warehouse, thus circumventing the possible problem of inconsistent data across jurisdictions (or so the plan goes).

Currently, the DTCC’s Trade Information Warehouse is the only recognised data repository for OTC credit derivatives, following its approval by the Fed as such earlier this year. The DTCC finally won approval to establish its Warehouse Trust subsidiary, which operates the repository, as a regulated entity at the start of 2010 after a solid year of campaigning.

According to DTCC, the move is intended to help ensure that regulators globally have secure and unfettered access to global data on CDSs, as requested by Michel Barnier, the European Commission’s internal market and services commissioner, back in April, by establishing identical CDS data sets on two different continents. Stewart Macbeth, managing director and general manager of the currently operating Trade Information Warehouse, explains: “DTCC has always envisaged a ‘global solution’ for repository services supporting each OTC asset class. It is very common for counterparties to be located on different continents and to trade on underlying securities issued across borders. This means that repositories for any asset class need to maintain global information to be useful. It also means that steps need to be taken to ensure that the data is always available to regulators globally regardless of events and circumstances taking place in one location or another.”

The issue of whether there should be a single global repository or multiple has caused some degree of friction in the political arena. The concern of those in favour of a single repository is that data may become too fragmented across multiple repositories and this would negate the benefit of establishing a repository in the first place. After all, regulators are seeking to have a more consolidated view of the markets globally.

But those on the side of multiple repositories, especially a European one, are concerned that a US-based repository would not provide enough access to non-US regulators. Europeans are keen for a European-based repository to be established in order to ensure that they also have guaranteed easy access to the required data in the case of the default of a systemically important financial institution or another market crisis. The issue is also deeply political, as the regulators are not keen to cede power to the US in this space.

This means that the DTCC’s proposals may solve these issues by providing identical repositories in both continents. The European repository will be headquartered in London under a regulatory application filed with the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the UK. The decision to establish the repository in London is based on a mandate by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) granted earlier this year.

However, this decision may prove problematic at a European level, given previous attitudes to London-based clearers from some corners of the regulatory and political arena. There may be renewed calls for a more European-based (read Continental European) alternative.

In the meantime, the proposals certainly meet the requirements set out in recent consultation papers on the subject, for example the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS) and the Technical Committee of the International Organisation of Securities Commissions’ (Iosco) paper released in May.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing the transaction reporting landscape post Brexit: MiFID II, SFTR, EMIR

The transaction reporting landscape has, for many financial institutions, expanded considerably in size since the end of the UK’s Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 and the resulting need for double reporting of some transactions to both EU and UK authorities. It has also changed dramatically following the UK government’s failure to reach equivalence...

BLOG

UK Sanctions Regime Increases Complexity and Cost of Compliance

The post-Brexit UK sanctions regime has added complexity to compliance, changes in financial institutions’ appetite for risk, and increased costs for multinational firms that must comply with both EU and UK sanctions regulation. These issues and more will be addressed at next week’s A-Team Group webinar on The post-Brexit UK sanctions regime – how to...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit Virtual

TradingTech Summit (TTS) Virtual will look at how trading technology operations can capitalise on recent disruption and leverage technology to find efficiencies in the new normal environment. The crisis has highlighted that the future is digital and cloud based, and the ability to innovate faster and at scale has become critical. As we move into recovery and ‘business as usual’, what changes and technology innovations should the industry adopt to simplify operations and to support speed, agility and flexibility in trading operations.

GUIDE

ESG Handbook 2021

A-Team Group’s ESG Handbook 2021 is a ‘must read’ for all capital markets participants, data vendors and solutions providers involved in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing and product development. It includes extensive coverage of all elements of ESG, from an initial definition and why ESG is important, to existing and emerging regulations, data challenges...