A-Team Insight Blogs

Share article

By Justin Lyon, Founder and CEO of Simudyne.

Sell-side firms are finding themselves extremely challenged in algo pre-production. According to our recent survey of 15 sell-side executives involved in algo trading, modeling is the most common, significant and recurring issue in algo pre-production – with many concerned that this is holding them back competitively.

The methodologies that firms use to model market conditions to test the behaviours of their algos are fairly standard, most use a combination of historical data and simulated data to put their algos through their paces. “We built a market simulator in pre-production to test all of our changes in UAT,” says one trading executive. “We use it extensively for regression testing as well as for testing new features, to make sure they are delivering the expected behaviours and results.”

“We have our own development environment where we are able to run historic simulations so that we can put extreme situations into that modeling environment,” said another trading executive. “You cannot model for every single market scenario, so it still requires some kind of controlled release process. There is no perfect modeling environment.”

Indeed, executives recognize the limitations inherent in these modeling approaches. Said one executive: “You don’t know what you don’t know. No matter how comprehensive our testing is, there will always be scenarios that we didn’t think of, or events in the real world that are not covered by the tests.” Said another: “This is more of an art, I’d say.”

Adjusting parameters on the fly

All the executives interviewed were only able to adjust a limited number of parameters on the fly – parameters that had been ‘pre-set’ in advance. For some firms, the number that they could adjust was very limited. Firms on average rated themselves as only middling in their ability to do this – scoring three on a scale of one to five.

“There are parameters that you never want to adjust on the fly. But there are other kinds of parameters that you need to adjust on the fly – for example, the passiveness or aggressiveness of the algo, to suit the client’s wishes,” said one executive. “Other changes and adjustments you need to test after you make them, to be sure they are working OK. You don’t want to adjust them on the fly. So, you wait until after trading hours and then test them and roll them out.”

In the survey, sell-side executives agreed that being able to adjust more parameters of their algos – having the confidence to be able to do that – on the fly would give them a significant advantage when it comes to improving execution quality. “This would allow us to test more quickly and ensure that our algos are performing without having to do as much running by,” said one executive. “It would allow us to make changes more efficiently, more safely across our algo base.”

Although it was difficult for respondents to estimate a financial benefit, a few were able to draw on their professional experience to do this. These respondents estimated that the financial benefit of such an approach could translate into substantial financial advantages – 0.05% to 1% improvement in the bottom line for a 1% improvement in fill rates.

Taking a new approach to algo testing

There is another way: agent-based simulation. Like an ‘algo gym’, agent-based simulations can help ensure execution algorithms are ready to be deployed in as wide a range of potential futures as possible. Rather than training algos by looking purely at the ‘surface’ data – the ‘real’ historical data produced by exchanges and other trading venues – agent-based simulations can recreate the data-generating process, producing synthetic market data that is indistinguishable from a given real-world time series.

By running thousands of simulations for every positive regime in this ‘algo gym’, the optimal decision path can be chosen by the algorithm every time. This can be run on the fly during the trading day, ensuring algos are optimized for all trading situations.

Justin Lyon
Ever since his studies at MIT in System Dynamics, Justin has been fascinated by applications of AI and machine learning to inform decision making. After working with the likes of Apple, the US Department of Defence, and the Bank of England, he founded Simudyne – a high growth simulation technology company that gives organizations a new way to test drive their decisions.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: High noon for surveillance: resolving tension between the costs of false positives, challenges of calibration, and compliance

When it comes to trade surveillance, regulators want firms to do their own alert calibration, examine all alerts, and keep auditable records. Firms need to balance the real cost of false positives with the technical challenge and risk of self-calibrating and auto-calibrating, while compliance, IT and vendors have to grapple with the need for defensible...

BLOG

BMO Acquisition of Clearpool Adds Holistic Trading Platform, Algo Management System and Broker-dealer

Clearpool, a New York-based provider of holistic electronic trading solutions and an independent agency broker-dealer, has entered a definitive agreement to be acquired by BMO Financial Group, parent of BMO Capital Markets. Clearpool expects the acquisition to accelerate development of its trading technology and provide infrastructure to become a global provider of a multi-asset electronic...

GUIDE

Directory of MiFID II Electronic Trading Venues 2018

The inaugural edition of A-Team Group’s Directory of MiFID II Electronic Trading Venues 2018 offers a guide to the European landscape resulting from new market structure introduced by the January 3, 2018 implementation of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II). The directory provides detailed profiles of more than 70 venue operators and their...