The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Counting the Costs and Constraints of Building In-House Solutions

Research commissioned by Asset Control highlights the pain points of updating or replacing in-house solutions, including cost, skills and resourcing, and the difficulty of deploying solutions to the cloud.

Headline statistics from the research show 94% of respondents expecting to encounter challenges of some sort when building a solution in-house, and 52% of senior decision makers in financial services organisations across the US and Europe looking to update or replace in-house solutions because they have become technologically outdated. Some 49% are pushed to schedule changes by increasing digitalisation within the business and 48% by the need to keep pace with the competition.

The survey underpinning the research was carried out by One Poll among 100 decision makers in financial firms with over 50 employees. Fifty of the firms are in the UK and 50 in the US.

According to the research, the challenges of building in house often lead, directly or indirectly, to greater costs, with skills and resourcing the biggest challenge of building a solution in-house, followed by staying within budget and having to adapt the solution to meet changing regulations or business requirements.

Martijn Groot, vice president of marketing and strategy at Asset Control, says: “The gradual accumulation of additional costs is one of the biggest problems with the in-house approach to technology development in financial services. Internal solutions are often approached as a project, a one-off cost, and are not regarded, and consequently budgeted, as an ongoing concern. This is unrealistic in a fast-changing financial services landscape.”

The ongoing costs of internal solutions tend to come from additional costs after implementation and hiring new developers after previous developers leave the business.

Groot comments: “The one-off approach, if executed well, may look attractive given that the firm is best placed to cater to its own specific requirements. However, the subsequent maintenance costs to keep the lights on and evolve the feature set to cope with emerging requirements are large.

“Also, with costing often done as a project, some operational costs tend to be hidden until an organisation wants to change something. This can be a challenge, particularly if the original developers have moved on, the platform is technologically outdated or does not lend itself well to cloud deployment. Unfortunately, the true costs and constraints of an internally developed solution often only become clear when firms need to change things.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Best practice approaches for corporate actions automation

Date: 18 November 2021 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Demand for timely and accurate corporate actions data is growing as volumes and complexity rise, and financial institutions acknowledge the increasingly costly gap between accurate corporate actions processing in real, or near-real, time and faulty processing caused by poor...

BLOG

Meeting ESG Demand – How this New Kind of Data Delivers Competitive Edge

By Stef Nielen, Strategic Business Development, Alveo. Buy-side financial firms are increasingly looking to tap into alternative data sets, including rapidly emerging environmental, social and governance (ESG) data to give them a competitive edge. There are several drivers behind this. First, regulation, and the European Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) in particular, forces funds to...

EVENT

Data Management Summit USA Virtual

Now in its 11th year, the Data Management Summit USA Virtual explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

ESG Handbook 2021

A-Team Group’s ESG Handbook 2021 is a ‘must read’ for all capital markets participants, data vendors and solutions providers involved in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing and product development. It includes extensive coverage of all elements of ESG, from an initial definition and why ESG is important, to existing and emerging regulations, data challenges...