The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Central Utility for Reference Data is Desirable but Not a Realistic Goal by Next Year, Say RDR Readers

According to the results of our latest reader poll, the majority of you believe that a central utility for reference data is a desirable addition to the market. Over half of respondents, at 52%, indicated a central utility is needed, but said that it is not a realistic goal for next year.

This should be music to the ears of DClear, the wholly owned subsidiary of the investment arm of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), which released plans for its reference data utility in May this year. The DClear team has not yet revealed the full timeline for its project implementation, but given the responses from the majority of Reference Data Review readers, it should take its time to get the foundation work right.

Chief technology officer of DClear, David Penney, reckons the argument for the introduction of a central utility is compelling. He draws attention to the fact that a large proportion of trade breaks occur because of an issue with reference data and claims that his kind of reference data provides no competitive advantage. It seems that the majority of readers agree with him in this regard, and consider the introduction of a central utility in this space a viable concept.

Only 22% of respondents were hopeful that a reference data utility could be a reality by the end of next year – perhaps some of them were privy to information that the 52% weren’t…?

However, not everyone is convinced that a reference data central utility is a desirable goal after all, with 26% of respondents indicating that they did not wish to see one introduced into the market. Perhaps they are concerned that its introduction would complicate matters further or involve prohibitive costs to an already overstretched industry.

There are also a number of issues that would need to be answered before a utility such as this could be introduced, for example, what data types will be covered, where will they source the data, how will they ensure it’s right, how will they encourage people to use the service and how will it be priced?

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Managing the transaction reporting landscape post Brexit: MiFID II, SFTR, EMIR

Date: 16 March 2021 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes The transaction reporting landscape has, for many financial institutions, expanded considerably in size since the end of the UK’s Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 and the resulting need for double reporting of some transactions to both EU...

BLOG

Time for Financial Institutions to Take Back Control of Market Data Costs

By Yann Bloch, Vice President of Product Management at NeoXam. Brexit may be just around the corner, but it is market data spending that financial institutions are more interested in taking back control of right now. In fact, other than regulatory equivalence post the transition period, it is hard to think of a more prominent...

EVENT

RegTech Summit London

Now in its 5th year, the RegTech Summit in London explores how the European financial services industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook – Fifth Edition

In response to the popularity of the A-Team Regulatory Data Handbook, we have published a fifth edition outlining the essentials of regulations that are likely to have an impact on data and data management at your organisation. New to this edition is a section on RegTech, covering drivers behind the development of innovative regulatory technology,...