The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

CCP Principles Can be Applied to Bilateral World of OTC Derivatives, Says Adsatis

Following on from its white paper last month, London-based consultancy Adsatis has published another report looking into the clearing counterparty (CCP) approach in comparison to bilateral agreements with regards to OTC derivatives. Adsatis consultant and author of the white paper, Bill Hodgson, reckons firms can apply aspects of the CCP approach to a non-CCP environment.

“Commentators, politicians and regulators have variously suggested hugely complex solutions to the worlds credit exposure crisis, such as a global trade registration system, clearing every single OTC product through a massive CCP, or abolishing OTC products altogether. Our contention is that the framework is already in place to handle the measurement and mitigation processes, but perhaps the market could learn from the CCP approach in how protection layers are constructed,” explains Hodgson.

The white paper, entitled “Comparing the ISDA bilateral exposure management model with a CCP”, like the title suggests, compares the way credit risk is managed using the bilateral ISDA Credit Support Annex (CSA) versus the risk management approach of a CCP. It highlights areas of difference such as membership criteria, quality of protection from credit risk and operational and timing issues.

Hodgson suggests that it may now be time for “CSA 2.0” in order to provide a more “meaningful link between risk and protection” in light of the current financial climate. Principles such as agreed data formats for publishing reconciliation data and the publication of the date on which the last valuation was calculated for a trade, both of which are used in the CCP version, could be adopted in the new version of the CSA, suggests the paper.

Although many OTC products will never be suitable for a CCP, this does not mean CCP principles cannot be applied to the area, Hodgson suggests. He concludes: “Isn’t it time to blend the experience of both markets and upgrade the financial technology to give firms a higher level of protection and a positive feedback loop to associate higher margin levels with illiquid products and to balance banks enthusiasm for such risky trading?”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The post-Brexit UK sanctions regime – how to stay safe and compliant

When the Brexit transition period came to an end on 31 December 2020, a new sanctions regime was introduced in the UK under legislation set out in the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (aka the Sanctions Act). The regime is fundamentally different to that of the EU, requiring financial institutions to rethink their response...

BLOG

2021 Predictions: Change is Afoot

By Marc Murphy, CEO, Fenergo. It almost feels like the financial industry went to bed in March 2020 and woke up in 2030. Prior to the pandemic, financial institutions had been falling behind when it came to digital transformation, only increasing resources when absolutely necessary. But now, the pandemic has forced financial institutions to make...

EVENT

RegTech Summit Virtual

The RegTech Summit Virtual is a global online event that will be held in June 2021 with an exceptional guest speaker line up of RegTech practitioners, regulators, start-ups and solution providers to collaborate and discuss innovative and effective approaches for building a better regulatory environment.

GUIDE

The Global LEI System – A Solution for Entity Data?

The Global LEI System – or GLEIS – has been in development since the middle of last year. Development has been patchy at times, but much has been done, leaving fewer outstanding issues, but also raising new questions. What’s emerging is a structure for the GLEIS going forward, complete with a mechanism for registering and...