About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Zeptonics Hit By Legal Ruling; Cannot Sell Ultra-Low-Latency Products

Subscribe to our newsletter

Australian financial trading technology vendor Zeptonics has been directed by the Federal Court of Australia to assign the ownership of certain of its products – including its ZeptoLink fanout device and ZeptoMatch matching engine – to proprietary trading firm Zomojo, which claimed ownership of them. It is considering appealing the decision, but for now it cannot sell them or support any companies using or evaluating them.

Zomojo claimed – and the court ruled – that ownership of ZeptoLink, ZeptoMatch (a matching engine), ZeptoNIC (a network interface card) and ZeptoAccess KRX (a trading gateway for the Korean Stock Exchange) resided with itself. As such, Zeptonics is not allowed to sell or support the use of those products. Zeptonics previously announced sales of ZeptoLink and its ZeptoMux switch to a Chicago-based trading firm, and say that “around half of the world’s top ten proprietary trading firms, have been in the process of trialing” its technology.

ZeptoMux – a many-to-one multiplexer with latency of 130 nanoseconds – is not covered by the ruling.

Without getting into all of the background and detail – the court ruling runs to 183 pages – at the heart of the dispute is Zeptonics founder Matthew Hurd, who worked at Zomojo for several years as its co-managing director and head of IT development.

Essentially, Hurd became unhappy working at Zomojo and left the company early in 2011, founding Zeptonics around the same time. Zomojo claims that Zeptonics’ technology is based on that developed by Hurd while he worked for it.

Zeptonics says that it believes it has “substantial grounds for appeal,” but has not determined whether to take that route. For its part, Zomojo does not seem interested in becoming a technology vendor, and is seeking the return of ZeptoLink devices installed at other trading firms.

The moral of the story: considerable due diligence is required when buying technology, especially when it is cutting edge from niche vendors, and likely to provide a real advantage.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating the Build vs Buy Dilemma: Cloud Strategies for Accelerating Quantitative Research

For many quantitative trading firms and asset managers, building a self-provisioned historical market data environment remains one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps in establishing a new research capability. Sourcing data, normalising symbologies, handling corporate actions and maintaining infrastructure can take months and absorb significant budget before a single model is tested. At the...

BLOG

The Buy-and-Build Line Keeps Moving – And That’s the Point

The old buy-versus-build debate in trading technology has been declared dead so many times it risks becoming a cliché. But at a recent A-Team Group webinar entitled How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach, sponsored by interop.io, a sharper question surfaced beneath the familiar framing: if...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions Europe 2010

The European corporate actions market could be the stage of some pretty heavy duty discussions regarding standards going forward, particularly with regards to the adoption of both XBRL tagging and ISO 20022 messaging. The region’s issuer community, for one, is not going to be easy to convince of the benefits of XBRL tags, given the...