About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Will EC, DoJ Reuters-Thomson Inquiries Strike at the Heart of the Matter: RICs?

Subscribe to our newsletter

The European Commission’s “in-depth investigation into Thomson’s takeover of Reuters” – announced earlier this month – is only to be expected. Whether it will put a dampener on things – by either quashing the deal or insisting on some very visible ‘sacrifice’ by the parties involved – remains to be seen.

Mechanically speaking, the EC investigation – whose announcement coincided with a ‘timing agreement’ with the US Justice Department – involves moving to a so-called Phase 2 review of the proposed transaction, enabling the commission to examine the deal and its impact on the competitive environment. This aspect of the review is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2008, and will involve the commission working with both Thomson and Reuters “to help narrow and resolve the issues which the EC has indicated require further review”. The EC has until February 28 next year to report on the matter. The Justice Department regulatory review, meanwhile, will conclude by January 15.

As predicted (Market Data Insight, May 2007), the EC’s initial investigation has highlighted concerns in the areas of “the provision of data feeds, the access to specific financial information databases commercialised by the notifying parties, the access to real-time and aftermarket research (broker reports) and the provision of news services’.

Reuters has already indicated that it is willing to make sacrifices to assuage these and any other regulatory concerns. Market practitioners, however, question whether a regulatory missive to spin-off one or more of the overlapping businesses would be any more than just, well, spin. To strike at the heart of monopolistic power, some say, the EC would need to hit Reuters’ secret weapon: the Reuters Instrument Code (RIC).

The complexities of the RIC’s relationship with the marketplace hopefully won’t be lost on EC and DoJ investigators. For its part, Reuters has flirted with the idea of making the RIC more widely available to the marketplace (twice in our memory) only to rein such plans back in pronto. Industry protagonists suggest an ‘open source’ approach to assigning RICs – which would allow third parties to issue codes as necessary – would be a significant step in levelling the market data playing field in the face of an imminent duopoly. But they would, wouldn’t they?

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Modernising Legacy Data Infrastructure to Create Agile and Accessible Digital Platforms

Date: 27 April 2023 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes In a highly competitive trading environment with little room for manoeuvre, financial institutions are looking to move on from legacy data infrastructure and build proprietary high-speed, low-latency trading systems offering agility, accelerated time-to-market, and potentially, competitive advantage. This is...

BLOG

A-Team Webinar to Discuss Data Transformation in Quant Research and Trading

Quantitative workflows rely on sourcing, aggregating, normalising and managing data. This can be highly resource-intensive, leading to a situation where some financial institutions with quant shops are more focused on data management than on data science and modeling. So how can the data ingestion, management, and pipeline processes of quant workflows be streamlined, allowing quants...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 12th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry, to explore how trading firms are innovating in today’s cloud and digital based environment to create flexible, scalable trading platforms to support speed to market and business agility.

GUIDE

The Global LEI System – A Solution for Entity Data?

The Global LEI System – or GLEIS – has been in development since the middle of last year. Development has been patchy at times, but much has been done, leaving fewer outstanding issues, but also raising new questions. What’s emerging is a structure for the GLEIS going forward, complete with a mechanism for registering and...