About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Why Further Brexit Delay Creates Greater Reporting Uncertainty for Fund Managers

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Quinn Perrott, co-CEO of TRAction.

There is a funny sense of déjà vu when it comes to the latest twist in the Brexit saga. The trouble is that whenever the can gets kicked down the road, market participants put Brexit to one side and allocate IT, process management and compliance resources elsewhere.

Then, as soon as the new deadline creeps up, firms need to dust off their plans, and work out how to modify their reporting, until the deadline gets extended again. This all amounts to a seemingly never-ending cycle of uncertainty when it comes to trade reporting. With the EU confirming a new deadline date of January 31st 2020, and Boris still trying to force through an early general election, there is more uncertainty now than ever.

This constant failure by politicians to reach an agreement adds a major administrative cost burden to investment firms, especially those offering delegated reporting to corporate clients, both in the UK and EU. Those funds managers subject to both EU MiFID II, and an FCA version of MiFID II, need clarity on whether or not they will need to split out transaction reporting duties. The trouble is, if an election is called and Boris loses, we could well enter second referendum territory, thus making all the reporting leg work done to date redundant.

Alternatively, if Boris manages to squeeze his deal through Parliament, then an EU investment firm executing its transactions via a UK branch or vice versa will have dual obligations. With so much reporting to deal with already, no investment firm wants the additional headache of reporting to two regulatory authorities. Fund managers domiciled in the EU will need to report to EU-based (as it will then be constituted) Trade Repositories (TRs) and Approved Reporting Mechanisms (ARMs). Investment Managers will need to continue to submit reports in the current format, but likely to UK-based TRs and ARMs, until such a time any changes are made by the FCA to MiFID to create a divergence from the current EU directives and regulations.

Thanks to this latest delay, it is still unclear what will be the specific impact will be on MiFID reporting. Yet fund managers can’t afford to sweep the Brexit issue under the carpet until the next deadline – whenever it will land. The only thing the buy-side can do, when it comes to reporting, is to try their best to prepare for all possible outcomes.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to leverage Generative AI and Large Language Models for regulatory compliance

Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) offer huge potential for change across capital markets, not least in regulatory compliance where they have the capability to help firms understand and interpret regulations, automate compliance, monitor transactions in real time, and flag anomalies in the same timeframe. They also present challenges including explainability, responsibility, model...

BLOG

Singapore-Based GRC Solutions Provider Xcelerate Secures Funding for Acquisitive Growth

Xcelerate, a Singapore-headquartered provider of governance, risk and compliance (GRC) solutions to industry sectors including capital markets, has secured an equity funding round with participation from funds managed by Altair Capital and Exacta Capital Partners. Co-founders, management and select existing shareholders of Xcelerate also participated in the funding, which will be used to finance acquisitions...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 14th year the Data Management Summit NYC brings together the North American data management community to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Enterprise Data Management

The current financial crisis has highlighted that financial institutions do not have a sufficient handle on their data and has prompted many of these institutions to re-evaluate their approaches to data management. Moreover, the increased regulatory scrutiny of the financial services community during the past year has meant that data management has become a key...