About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

US Regulators Pushing for Increased Pricing Transparency Around CDSs

Subscribe to our newsletter

US regulators have this week been highlighting the need for more transparency around OTC derivatives pricing, in particular around credit default swaps (CDS), which are now moving towards being centrally cleared in the market. Speaking in New York at an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) conference, Theo Lubke, senior vice-president at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, told delegates that the CDS market must act as a benchmark for other OTC markets with regards to pricing transparency.

The Fed uses CDS prices as a benchmark to assess market and credit risk, explained Lubke, and this means that transparency is of systemic importance in this space. He reckons a lot more needs to be done to improve transparency around the pricing of these instruments and soon: “The more CDS is used as a reference tool, the more important it is that market participants understand the pricing process.”

Moving CDSs and other OTC derivatives onto central clearing counterparties (CCPs), as suggested by the Obama administration’s regulatory overhaul proposals, is likely to improve pricing transparency to some extent. Indices on CDSs have already begun to be cleared by the CCPs currently operating in the market and this has indeed meant that pricing for these has been made publicly available. However, clearing on these CCPs has not yet been mandated by Congress and it will take regulatory approval for this to happen on a wider scale.

The goal of the regulators may be to mitigate counterparty risk in the OTC derivatives market but a side effect will be institutionalising pricing sources. Pricing feeds that are employed by the various CCPs will therefore give certain data providers the edge over others, although the need for financial institutions to provide best price to their clients will also add to the valuations data cause.

Congress is due to vote on these measures before the end of the year and the valuations vendor community will have to wait until then before it can judge the full impact of regulation on the space.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: MiFID II – Practical Considerations for Gainful Compliance

The EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II is set to be top of the trading technology agenda for 2016. It’s impact will be more granular, prescriptive and onerous than the original MiFID regulation, raising business and technology challenges for those financial institutions affected, which need to be resolved within a tight deadline. Listen...

BLOG

Navigating the Complex New Sanctions Landscape: Webinar Preview

The criticality of sanctions to the armoury of international relations has been amplified over the past decade as geopolitical and trade tensions have intensified. Since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its attempted full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, governments around the world have increased sanctions on nations and entities by 700%, according to...

EVENT

AI in Data Management Summit New York City

Following the success of the 15th Data Management Summit NYC, A-Team Group are excited to announce our new event: AI in Data Management Summit NYC!

GUIDE

Putting the LEI into Practice

Hundreds of thousands of pre-Legal Entity Identifiers (LEIs) have been issued by pre-Local Operating Units (LOUs) in the Global LEI System (GLEIS), and the standard entity identifier has been mandated for use by regulators in both the US and Europe. As more pre-LEIs are issued ahead of the establishment of the global systems’ Central Operating...