About a-team Marketing Services

A-Team Insight Blogs

Talking Intelligent Trading with Andrew Delaney: It’s Time to Buy and Build

Subscribe to our newsletter

As we put the last-minute touches on our agenda for next week’s Intelligent Trading Summit in New York – register here if you haven’t already – we continue to canvass the marketplace on what makes a trading platform intelligent. Part of the story, we are finding, is in approach to design. And the message we are hearing is that after a decade of polarisation in the build vs. buy debate, there is emerging a Third Way.

The concept of buying component parts and building them into a preferred trading architecture is gaining moment. Call it build AND buy. Its genesis appears to have been the recognition among larger players in particular that building everything yourself is no longer a) a requirement for key elements of trading system functionality and b) cost-effective at a time when everything is being squeezed.

And lower vendor price points, based on use of more open technologies and new commercial models like open-source, means that smaller players can start to add unique functionality where before they were constrained by resource to use of vanilla third-party systems with little scope for differentiation.

Underpinning all of this is a visible trend toward freedom from reliance on a single supplier, even as the post-trade data management requirement becomes more complex the more components are involved. (Indeed, a common emerging complaint is the difficulty in integrating the output from multiple trading systems in a way that can be applied to the raft of new reporting requirements being demanded by regulators.)

Those with the savvy and resource are building trading infrastructures based around central messaging platforms. They are integrating front-end components – OMS, EMS, market data – from third-party suppliers. And they’re driving all post-trade messaging across the platform to middle- and back-office functions like risk management, regulatory reporting and settlement.

Ensuring consistency of data is the new challenge, driving a potential trade-off between performance/functionality and the ability to handle data outputs from multiple systems. We’ll be hearing about some of this at ITS in New York next week, where experts from the likes of sponsors Fidessa, Tibco and IBM will share their insights into how they are helping clients develop intelligent trading systems in this new environment. And we’ll be hosting a webinar on the topic, probably in June, to delve into drivers, challenges and best practices.

In all this excitement, I find myself humming a familiar tune. With apologies – once again – to Paul McCartney, it goes something like this:

‘And in this ever-changin’ world in which we’re living

Makes you give it a try – To build AND buy’

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practices for compliance with EU Market Abuse Regulation

EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) came into force in July 2016, rescinding the previous Market Abuse Directive and replacing it with a significantly extended scope of regulatory obligations. Eight years later, and amid constant change in capital markets regulation, technology and culture, financial institutions continue to struggle to stay on the right side of the...

BLOG

A Dive into the Detail of the Financial Data Transparency Act’s Data Standards Requirements

As the June 2024 deadline looms for US regulators within the scope of the Financial Data Transparency Act (FTDA) to provide joint rules on data standards and reporting formats, the question of what these standards and formats will be remains open. Front runners are the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) and eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL),...

EVENT

TradingTech Briefing New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

The Reference Data Utility Handbook

The potential of a reference data utility model has been discussed for many years, and while early implementations failed to gain traction, the model has now come of age as financial institutions look for new data management models that can solve the challenges of operational cost reduction, improved data quality and regulatory compliance. The multi-tenanted...