About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

New Data Validation Steps Required Under CESR’s Proposed MiFID Client Categorisation Regime Changes

Subscribe to our newsletter

As part of the ongoing review of MiFID, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) has published a new consultation paper on the subject of client categorisation that indicates a more structured approach to maintaining and monitoring entity data will be required within European financial institutions. The proposed requirements, which are aimed at strengthening investor protection, introduce new criteria for consideration when categorising clients under MiFID for reporting purposes, which will mean data managers will need to add new steps into the workflow for customer data.

Firms need to add in new data validation steps to ensure that the updated categories are applied to their customer data sets. For example, the consultation paper indicates that CESR is planning to narrow the range of regulated entities that can qualify to be treated as clients who are considered to be professionals. This means firms will have to set up data checking around the three new criteria: whether the entity is regulated or authorised in a jurisdiction with an equivalent regulatory regime to the EU; whether it is conducting business on behalf of underlying clients or not; and the size of the entity. And this is just one of the changes.

Others include geographic distinctions such as whether the entity resides in a member state that has fully implemented the MiFID directive or the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).

The aim is to move from a broad brush approach to client categorisation to providing much more clarity about the data items that must be assessed during this process. CESR indicates that tests around a potential client’s knowledge and experience may also be introduced, which would add in a new set of data to the process. It also highlights the current challenges around very complex products and for standards that apply when business is done with eligible counterparties, and asks for feedback about how the industry feels these should be approached.

Many of the other changes are related to the wording of MiFID and although they may seem cosmetic, they could have significant implications on data categorisation. Industry participants should therefore bear these in mind when making any impact assessments of the proposals.

The is therefore asking for feedback about whether the industry is behind these recommended changes and in order to assess the impact of the changes on firms, including their data management teams. Firms have until 9 August to respond to the 11 related questions in the consultation paper.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

ESMA’s “Data Day” and Regulatory Digitalisation

When ESMA convened its first ‘Data Day’ on 2 December 2025, the agenda title – “Burden reduction in the digitalisation era” – captured a shift that has been building across Europe’s regulatory landscape for several years. While markets been advancing shared data models and machine-executable reporting logic through initiatives such as the Common Domain Model...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...