About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

National Interests

Subscribe to our newsletter

Swift’s annual user conference behemoth Sibos kicked off this morning with a debate about the future of securities market infrastructures that painted a particularly sobering picture. Obviously, with the spectre of a potential breakup of the Eurozone loitering in the background, discussion turned to what the impact of such an event would be on the region’s market infrastructures. The answer, it appears, is a breakdown of communications cross border and a renewed focus on the market protectionism that already exists within the global landscape.

Regardless of whether the breakdown of the Eurozone is allowed to happen or not (and the potentially catastrophic results of which are a popular topic of discussion in the convention centre today), this element of national interest has already had a profound effect on infrastructure development thus far. This has been ably demonstrated by the plethora of central clearing counterparties (CCPs) that have sprung up across the globe, raging arguments amongst regulators about extraterritoriality and the continuing debate about oversight of data repositories.

National regulators are not keen to cede power to a central body or to a foreign counterpart, especially one across the pond. However, this morning’s debate did not touch on how this dynamic might impact the utility for legal entity identifiers (LEI) that Swift and its key partner, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC), are planning to develop with ISO to meet the requirements of the US Office of Financial Research (OFR).

Surely, given that it’s a task that is seeking to meet the requirements of all the regulators under the sun (it is, after all, a global identifier), these developments will have a significant impact on the initiative? Given my bent for asking awkward questions, I shall endeavour to pose a few pertinent ones to the panel later this week that is due to be debating the practicalities of introducing an LEI. Jurisdictional turf wars may prove another stumbling block for the partners to overcome.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

The Case Against Ripping and Replacing: Why Capital Markets Firms Should Build Intelligence Into What They Already Have

By Neil Vernon, Chief Product Officer, Gresham. For years, capital markets firms have faced the same challenge: modernising sprawling, legacy data systems. Each attempt follows a familiar pattern – ambitious platform overhauls, eight-figure budgets, years of disruption – yet the old systems often remain in use long after the new ones are live. Replacing systems...

EVENT

TEST Event page 2

Now in its 15th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

What the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Will Mean for Your Firm

It’s hard to believe that as early as the 2009 Group of 20 summit in Pittsburgh the industry had recognised the need for greater transparency as part of a wider package of reforms aimed at mitigating the systemic risk posed by the OTC derivatives market. That realisation ultimately led to the Dodd Frank Act, and...