About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

National Interests

Subscribe to our newsletter

Swift’s annual user conference behemoth Sibos kicked off this morning with a debate about the future of securities market infrastructures that painted a particularly sobering picture. Obviously, with the spectre of a potential breakup of the Eurozone loitering in the background, discussion turned to what the impact of such an event would be on the region’s market infrastructures. The answer, it appears, is a breakdown of communications cross border and a renewed focus on the market protectionism that already exists within the global landscape.

Regardless of whether the breakdown of the Eurozone is allowed to happen or not (and the potentially catastrophic results of which are a popular topic of discussion in the convention centre today), this element of national interest has already had a profound effect on infrastructure development thus far. This has been ably demonstrated by the plethora of central clearing counterparties (CCPs) that have sprung up across the globe, raging arguments amongst regulators about extraterritoriality and the continuing debate about oversight of data repositories.

National regulators are not keen to cede power to a central body or to a foreign counterpart, especially one across the pond. However, this morning’s debate did not touch on how this dynamic might impact the utility for legal entity identifiers (LEI) that Swift and its key partner, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC), are planning to develop with ISO to meet the requirements of the US Office of Financial Research (OFR).

Surely, given that it’s a task that is seeking to meet the requirements of all the regulators under the sun (it is, after all, a global identifier), these developments will have a significant impact on the initiative? Given my bent for asking awkward questions, I shall endeavour to pose a few pertinent ones to the panel later this week that is due to be debating the practicalities of introducing an LEI. Jurisdictional turf wars may prove another stumbling block for the partners to overcome.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: End-to-End Lineage for Financial Services: The Missing Link for Both Compliance and AI Readiness

The importance of complete robust end-to-end data lineage in financial services and capital markets cannot be overstated. Without the ability to trace and verify data across its lifecycle, many critical workflows – from trade reconciliation to risk management – cannot be executed effectively. At the top of the list is regulatory compliance. Regulators demand a...

BLOG

Swap Data Was Supposed to Deliver Transparency. A Decade Later, Regulators Are Still Trying to Use It

For more than a decade, regulators have collected vast quantities of derivatives transaction data through swap data repositories (SDRs) mandated by post-crisis financial reforms. Yet despite the scale of these datasets, transforming reported trade data into meaningful supervisory insight has often proved more difficult than policymakers anticipated. A new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

The Global LEI System – Slow but Sure

After what looked like a slow start to the summer, the initiative to establish a global standard for legal entity identifiers (LEIs) took a series of significant leaps forward during August, that appears to have put the project firmly back on track. If the marketplace felt a little reticent in June and July, it could...