About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Myners’ Voting Rights Proposals Could Pose Significant Data Challenges

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK’s Financial Services Secretary Paul Myners’ proposals to establish a two tier shareholder register could add another layer of data complexity for financial institutions operating in the market. The proposals are aimed at ensuring longstanding institutional investors receive greater voting clout than short term investors and preventing the increase in what Myners calls “ownerless corporations”.

Myners this week elaborated on the rationale behind differential voting rights thusly: “We need to look at ways in which we can offer a carrot to some financial institutions to take the issue of ownership more seriously. In many cases hedge funds might only be shareholders for a few weeks. Should they be treated in the same way as a long term shareholder or should we be doing more to reward and engage the long term shareholder?”

The impact of introducing a two tier system, similar to that of France or Sweden, would be to fundamentally alter the current ‘one share, one vote’ principle for shareholders in the UK. This in turn, would significantly impact the way that corporate actions data is weighted and processed, as if any more complexity was needed in this particularly tricky area of the market!

As well as recording when shareholders vote, third party data providers and custodians would be required to weight these votes subject to the different classes of investor. Myners has not yet elaborated on what a long term investor would look like – how long is long term? Industry standard classifications would therefore need to be defined first for these categories, before any of this work could begin.

Obviously data providers and vendors active in markets with multi-tiered voting rights would be at an advantage over those focused solely on markets such as the UK. But it would likely pose a data challenge for custodians’ internal data departments: to add another data attribute to monitor on top of those that already need to be captured in the corporate actions process.

However, the proposals may not get very far, as they have provoked a significant backlash from the institutional investment market, which is wary of a two tier system. David Paterson, head of corporate governance at the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF), says: “It fails to take into account the need for managers to buy or sell shares based on external factors. What is needed is better dialogue between companies and shareholders.”

The Investment Management Association is also up in arms about the idea and contends that the government should not be in a position to mandate the best way for firms to manage money. Multi-tiered voting rights would potentially expose firms to be subject to the whim of a small group of investors, the industry group argues.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: An Agile Approach to Investment Management Platforms for Private Markets and the Total Portfolio View

Data and operations professionals at private market institutions face significant data and analytical challenges managing private assets data. With investors clamouring for advice and analysis of private markets in their search for returns, investment managers are looking at ways to gain a more meaningful view of risk and performance across all asset types held by...

BLOG

Businesses Struggling with ESG Data that will Aid SFDR Compliance

Most businesses are struggling to prepare their data to meet a new European regulation that is designed in part to deliver huge troves of corporate ESG information into financial institutions’ systems. More than four-fifths of companies questioned in a study by data mastering company Semarchy said they lack confidence in their data management capabilities to...

EVENT

ESG Data & Tech Briefing London

The ESG Data & Tech Briefing will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...