About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

MiFID II Proposals: Perspective from MarketAxess

Subscribe to our newsletter

MarketAxess Holdings, the operator of a leading electronic trading platform for U.S. and European high-grade corporate bonds, emerging markets bonds and other fixed income securities, reiterates its views on the range of proposals outlined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), which is scheduled to be finalized in October.

MarketAxess believes that:

  • the introduction of a consolidated trade tape for the European over-the-counter markets would enhance price transparency and facilitate measurement of best execution;
  • multi-dealer electronic trading venues can improve market efficiency through enhanced transparency and increased competition.

We have concerns that:

  • a prescriptive pre-trade transparency regime in OTC markets would not provide any meaningful additional price transparency;
  • a consolidated tape run by a single or competing entity could lead to conflicts of interest; and
  • divergent regulatory standards for derivatives trading between Europe and the US would be harmful to investors.

Consolidated Tape

MarketAxess is a strong believer in the introduction of a consolidated trade tape. Experience in the U.S. shows that an appropriately administered consolidated trade tape increases price transparency without harming liquidity. In addition, it provides a tool for measuring best execution in OTC markets.

Pre-trade transparency

We do not believe that a prescriptive regime in over-the-counter (OTC) markets, requiring publication of pre-trade data in a continuous manner, would provide any meaningful additional price transparency over and above that provided by a real-time consolidated trade tape. It is our experience that larger, institutional size trades are more effectively conducted on a request-for-quote (RFQ) basis.

In less liquid markets, where the range of instruments traded is numerous but the volume in each is low, participants are not generally prepared to publish pre-trade information on larger trade sizes or to make pre-trade prices executable.

Post-trade transparency

MarketAxess supports the European Commission’s objective of improving post-trade transparency and thinks that an appropriate benchmark when considering the timing for publication of trade information in the fixed income markets would be the 15 minute reporting deadline adopted for FINRA’s (“Financial Industry Regulatory Authority”) TRACE (“Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine”) tape in the U.S. However, we believe that a mechanism needs to be included that prevents trades that might have market impact from being immediately disseminated with full trade details.

Electronic trade execution

MarketAxess supports the European Commission’s approach that requires greater use of electronic trading venues. MarketAxess believes that multi-dealer venues improve market efficiencies through enhanced transparency and increased competition. Our detailed, quantifiable analysis demonstrates that in less liquid markets, such as corporate bonds, investors receive a better price of execution when a larger group of dealers are put into competition. As such we recommend that for more standardized OTC transactions, the venue of choice should be a multi-lateral trading facility (MTF).

Regulatory divergence

We have serious concerns that the introduction of organized trading facilities (OTFs) may create divergent regulatory regimes for derivatives trading in Europe and the U.S., which could lead to regulatory arbitrage. In the US, standardized derivatives will only be able to trade on an exchange or a swap execution facility (“SEF”). For example, although in the U.S. it does not appear that the SEF definition will allow for single dealer venues, such venues could be permitted under MiFID II.

Conclusion

MarketAxess supports the European Commission in its aim to bring greater transparency to the over-the-counter markets and we believe that greater use of electronic trading venues is central to achieving this. Based on our experience of the U.S. over-the-counter markets, we also believe that the introduction of a consolidated trade tape will provide a key benchmark against which best execution can be measured in these markets.

Through our detailed research and analysis, we have been able to derive statistically robust data to support the advantages of electronic trading to achieve greater price transparency and efficiency of execution.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating the Build vs Buy Dilemma: Cloud Strategies for Accelerating Quantitative Research

For many quantitative trading firms and asset managers, building a self-provisioned historical market data environment remains one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps in establishing a new research capability. Sourcing data, normalising symbologies, handling corporate actions and maintaining infrastructure can take months and absorb significant budget before a single model is tested. At the...

BLOG

Defensibility: The New Watchword for Data Management

George Tziahanas, VP of Compliance at Archive360. Regulated enterprises are discovering that the hardest part of scaling new technology such as AI isn’t adoption; it’s proving those technologies are properly controlled. For financial institutions in particular – including banks, asset managers, insurers, and capital markets firms – this challenge is intensified by long-standing regulatory expectations...

EVENT

ExchangeTech Summit London

A-Team Group, organisers of the TradingTech Summits, are pleased to announce the inaugural ExchangeTech Summit London on May 14th 2026. This dedicated forum brings together operators of exchanges, alternative execution venues and digital asset platforms with the ecosystem of vendors driving the future of matching engines, surveillance and market access.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...