About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

London Stock Exchange Goes Live with Sedol Master File Service

Subscribe to our newsletter

The London Stock Exchange’s widely anticipated Sedol Master File (SMF) service went live on March 15 in the hopes of exploiting what it sees as an opportunity to supply more detailed identity information particularly in the area of cross-border trading. After the first week of operation, around 50% of the LSE’s users had accessed the SMF service, and the remainder are expected to do so over the week or so.

The LSE has expanded its Sedol codes from seven-digit numeric codes to an alphanumeric code aimed at increased capacity in code issuance. At the same time, the exchange has taken the opportunity to add capabilities including real-time issuance of new Sedol codes, greater coverage of listed equities and fixed-income securities, and easier identification of the market at instrument is traded on through mapping to Market Identifier Codes (MICs).

The addition of MICs to the equation is aimed at addressing calls for more clarity about an issue’s official place of listing (OPOL). Market participants have recently voiced concerns about confusion over where stocks traded cross-border are actually listed. Indeed, the operator of the ISIN standard, the ANNA Service Bureau, apparently in anticipation of the LSE’s launch of SMF, has added MICs to the ISIN numbering system (Reference Data Review, February 2004). Under that arrangement, Telekurs Financial, on behalf of the ANNA Service Bureau, will provide OPOL-related information linking the MIC to the ISIN for any security contained within the ANNA Service Bureau’ ISIN database.

The LSE went live internally with the web system supporting SMF on March 8 and opened it up for external access on March 15. The March rollout followed a postponement from the original January live date due to high demand and worries that users wouldn’t be fully prepared in time for launch.

On March 15, the LSE began distributing passwords to the SMF website, a process expected to take two weeks. Once they have access to the SMF site, users can create alphanumeric Sedol codes electronically via the website. The exchange, however, will continue to support phone and e-mail inquiry/request services. It’s understood that around 50% of those clients have accessed the system. So far, clients have been logging in to familiarize themselves with the new service; it’s too early to tell how it has been received.

During the earlier testing phase, the LSE made use of 5,000 test codes in the new alphanumeric format. Users could access files containing the new alphanumeric Sedol and MIC codes, either directly from the exchange or via their data vendors. Users and the vendors had to ensure their systems could also work with the new database structure the LSE had created as part of the SMF project.

Industry lobby groups Reference Data User Group (RDUG) and the Reference Data Coalition (Redac) have been leading industry debate over solving the OPOL issue. The German data user group, Dessug, expressed concerns late last year about market confusion over OPOL and the concept of ‘official place of trading’ (Reference Data Review, January 2004). Redac and RDUG have been pushing for a glossary of terms describing this area of the business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: How to maximise the use of data standards and identifiers beyond compliance and in the interests of the business

Date: 18 July 2024 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Data standards and identifiers have become common currency in regulatory compliance, bringing with them improved transparency, efficiency and data quality in reporting. They also contribute to automation. But their value does not end here, with data standards and identifiers...

BLOG

Best Practice Approaches to Trade Surveillance for Market Abuse

In 2023, Openmarkets Australia was fined the largest ever penalty imposed by the?Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) of $4.5 million. Among other observations, the regulators noted that Openmarkets had not appropriately calibrated its post-trade surveillance system and that this resulted in an unmanageable volume of alerts, most of which were not reviewed.  “This outcome...

EVENT

ESG Data & Tech Summit London

The ESG Data & Tech Summit will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.

GUIDE

BCBS 239 Data Management Handbook

Our 2015/2016 edition of the BCBS 239 Data Management Handbook has arrived! Printed copies went like hotcakes at our Data Management Summit in New York but you can download your own copy here and get access to detailed information on the  principles and implications of BCBS 239 on Data Management. This Handbook provides an at-a-glance...