About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Lack of Equivalence Post Brexit Raises Costly Data Management Concerns

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK has finally left the European Union. A trade deal was wrung out at the eleventh hour, allowing the two sides to trade with zero tariffs and quotas, but the financial services industry has been left hanging – with talk of an MoU around the regulation of financial services being reached by March 2021 at the earliest.

For capital markets participants, the failure to reach equivalence is a costly concern with firms operating in both the EU and UK needing to segregate data to meet the regulatory requirements of each jurisdiction. They also need confirmation on whether they can continue to share data internally within their own organisations and with third-parties across jurisdictions in which they operate.

Volker Lainer, vice president of product management and regulatory affairs at GoldenSource, warns that the fundamentally different approaches to regulating finance taken by the FCA and ESMA mean we could see divergence in the near future on a host of different market rules and requirements.

“It’s fair to say most people in 2020 wanted to see the back of the UK-EU negotiation talks almost as much as an end to the pandemic. For those in the financial services industry, though, the failure to agree equivalence will carry on having an important impact on their day-to-day activity for some time going forward,” he says. “While some key elements of financial market structure have been agreed – for now – the different approaches of the FCA and ESMA to market rules and regulations may result in divergence in the near future. As a result, firms operating in both jurisdictions will need to have better data segregation to respond to the split regulatory reporting. The recovery from 2020 will be tricky enough and market participants can’t rely on any agreement in early 2021 to resolve the issues stemming from this.”

As of now, the UK has only limited access to the European market (worth over $40 billion), while much of European stock trade has already shifted away from the City of London (according to Bloomberg, over 90% of European stock trading on Aquis, Cboe, and the LSE’s Turquoise switched to Europe on Monday – worth over $5 billion in trades).

UK financial services firms no longer have passporting rights to the EU, meaning that they will eventually have to (in theory at least) comply with the different regulatory requirements of each European country in which they operate, if they wish to continue trading, adding immense complexity and cost. A shortcut would be equivalence – but it’s not that simple.

In November 2020, UK chancellor Rishi Sunak promised that the UK would grant equivalence from January 1, 2021 to EEA-based financial services in areas including credit ratings agencies and derivatives trading. But the EU has been far more reticent, so far agreeing only to time limited equivalence decisions for derivatives clearing and settling Irish securities.

A broader equivalence decision has not been formally negotiated and does not form part of the official UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) as it stands. In fact, the EU document specifically states that “the Agreement does not cover any decisions relating to equivalences for financial services.”

Although a Temporary Permissions Regime has been implemented by the UK to support European firms operating in the UK, the FCA warned on 31 December, 2020 that: “The extent to which UK firms can continue to provide services to customers in the EEA depends on local law and local regulators’ expectations.”

UK Prime  Minister Boris Johnson has himself admitted that the deal “perhaps does not go as far as we would like” in the field of financial services, and the current situation leaves everything very much up in the air. Urgent talks to reach a rapid EU financial services agreement are due to start this week, led by City Minister John Glen and senior Treasury civil servant Katharine Braddick, with an MoU roughly pencilled in for March. But many industry participants are less than optimistic about the prospects for a quick decision on regulatory equivalence from Brussels.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: ESG data sourcing and management to meet your ESG strategy, objectives and timeline

ESG data plays a key role in research, fund product development, fund selection, asset selection, performance tracking, and client and regulatory reporting, yet it is not always easy to source and manage in a complete, transparent and timely manner. This webinar will review the state-of-play on ESG data, consider the challenges of sourcing and managing...

BLOG

J.P. Morgan Adds Containerised Data for Institutional Investors to Fusion Data Mesh

J.P. Morgan has added Containerized Data for institutional investors to its Fusion data mesh. The solution normalises data across multiple providers, sources, types and structures and provides consistent and enriched data across business services. Fusion is a cloud-native data technology platform that provides data management, analytics and reporting, and is built on J.P. Morgan’s global...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 14th year the Data Management Summit NYC brings together the North American data management community to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Entity Data Management & the LEI

Just over a year since the Financial Stability Board handed over leadership and direction of the interim Global Legal Entity Identifier System – or GLEIS – to the Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC) of the LEI the entity identifier is being used for reporting under European Market Infrastructure Regulation. This report discusses recent developments in the...