About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Investment Banks Can’t Afford Not to MIND the Front Office Risk GAP

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Oliver Blower, CEO of VoxSmart.

A phrase heard by so many only to be listened to by so few. “Mind the gap”, synonymous with the mundane morning commuter grind, currently takes on a far greater significance for City traders travelling to work.

Not dissimilar to the cost conundrum facing the rail industry recently, when it comes to plugging gaps between when the trade was executed vs when it was booked, it is fair to say investment banks have been struggling. For too long now, trading desks have fallen foul of Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) requirements to book tickets within 15 minutes of executing their trades. Consequently, investment banks have been left paying in excess of £50 million per annum in fines.

Therefore, in these cost-conscious times, how and why have so many of the biggest financial institutions found themselves in this situation? The answer to this question lies in the daily interactions that take place between traders. As a case in point, a trader at say Morgan Stanley may well call up a counterparty at Citi to buy half a yard of dollar/yen, before then heading down the pub and subsequently forgetting to book the trade for three days. While the Citi trader may have booked the trade, the Morgan Stanley risk department has no clue because their trader is already three pints in down the Red Lion. The point is that no investment bank throughout this year can afford to be in a position where they are brushing this issue under the sticky pub carpet.

After years of seeing the PRA fines as a necessary evil, banks know they need to have a better grasp of their cost base. Today, a head of desks profit and loss (P&L) is coming under intense scrutiny from the business to reduce gross revenues to net revenues where possible. As a result, the days of absorbing these costs are long gone. From FX and rate to credit and equity derivatives, every single desk is under the microscope right now. The numbers that banks can recuperate from fines are now in the tens of millions – which is a significant percentage of any desks P&L.

The good news is that investment banks can turn to tech to close the front office risk gap. Certain firms are already deploying tools that enable them to become much more efficient in terms of their execution and booking capabilities. Ultimately, if banks are going to thrive in these bottom line conscious and compliance heavy times, identifying pivotal issues surrounding trade booking and execution times is one major way to shave a few million off the cost base.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content


Upcoming Webinar: Modernising Legacy Data Infrastructure to Create Agile and Accessible Digital Platforms

Date: 27 April 2023 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes In a highly competitive trading environment with little room for manoeuvre, financial institutions are looking to move on from legacy data infrastructure and build proprietary high-speed, low-latency trading systems offering agility, accelerated time-to-market, and potentially, competitive advantage. This is...


LSEG Agrees to Acquire Risk Management Provider Acadia

Following its acquisitions of MayStreet and Tora earlier this year, London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) has now turned its sights on the derivatives post trade space by agreeing to acquire Acadia, a provider of derivatives margin processing and risk and optimisation services. Acadia, established in 2009, provides risk management, margining and collateral services to global...


Data Management Summit London

Now in its 13th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.


The Reference Data Utility Handbook

The potential of a reference data utility model has been discussed for many years, and while early implementations failed to gain traction, the model has now come of age as financial institutions look for new data management models that can solve the challenges of operational cost reduction, improved data quality and regulatory compliance. The multi-tenanted...