About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Industry Doubts Urgency Of US CFTC’s Reg AT

Subscribe to our newsletter

The industry’s sense of urgency concerning Reg AT is dropping, because little action is expected to put its rules in effect in the US following the May 1 ending of the comment period on the regulation.

Reg AT, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Regulation Automated Trading, contains risk and transparency provisions for automated trading. The CFTC issued the proposal in November and later extended the comment period beyond January to May.

“Not many people are expecting a revised proposal to come out quickly,” says Aisha Dudhia, deputy head of research at JWG, a financial regulation consultancy. “Considering the political situation in the US, people believe it may still be awhile because they’re not sure what will happen. But people do expect revised changes based on the proposal.”

JWG organised a Trade Surveillance Special Interest Group, comprised of about 35 people representing buy- and sell-side firms, and data vendors, which met last week to consider potential Reg AT issues. “They are concerned that Reg AT might not go ahead, so at the moment it’s not so much of a priority for them,” Dudhia says, describing the sentiment in the group.

However, there are some similarities between Reg AT, MiFID II and Germany’s High Frequency Trading Act, which has firms looking at Reg AT in conjunction with those laws. MiFID II takes effect in January, and the German law has been in effect since 2013.

“Where a regulation ‘gold plates’ — where it has the highest criteria or requirements, that’s the regulation they are following for that specific element,” says Dudhia. “Firms are still doing analysis to determine which of these three ‘gold plates’ on certain requirements. In general, MiFID II is the most prescriptive, but some elements of Reg AT are a bit different.”

Regardless of whatever restrictions Reg AT places on automated trading, automation requires careful thought and consideration, beyond just compliance concerns, as Nirvana Farhadi, global head of financial services regtech, risk and regulatory compliance at Hitachi Data Systems, explains.

“Firms must ask how mature the technology is to avoid getting ‘garbage in/garbage out’ results,” she says. “Automation is a process that might not necessarily be possible to link on top of your legacy systems. Making it fresher, flexible and agile means looking more strategically at the long-term areas of what they need to achieve. Platforms and infrastructure within an organisation need to be more agile and flexible to accommodate automation.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Transforming Data Experiences in Quantitative Research and Trading

For quantitative researchers and quant trading teams at banking and capital markets firms, the ability to access, integrate, and share data is critical. Data and how teams collaborate with data underpins the ability to generate alpha, perform execution analyses, and provide a modern and differentiated client experience. However, for most banks, legacy technology stacks and...

BLOG

Arbuthnot Latham Taps Clausematch to Digitise Compliance Framework

Private bank Arbuthnot Latham is adopting Clausematch’s policy management platform to automate and streamline its compliance processes. The initiative aims to digitise Arbuthnot’s policy and compliance framework. According to Clausematch, Arbuthnot will use its proprietary policy management solution to reduce the time and risk of policy maintenance by giving compliance teams a centralised platform for...

EVENT

RegTech Summit London

Now in its 6th year, the RegTech Summit in London will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the European capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Applications of Reference Data to the Middle Office

Increasing volumes and the complexity of reference data in the post-crisis environment have left the middle office struggling to meet the requirements of the current market order. Middle office functions must therefore be robust enough to be able to deal with the spectre of globalisation, an increase in the use of esoteric security types and...