About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Hierarchies – Approach with Care

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Colin Gibson, Architecture & Data Management Consultant at Katano Limited.

What is the item you find hardest to locate in a supermarket? You know where to find it in your local store, but what confounds you when you try to find it in a different chain? What about Bovril Yeast Extract (other yeast extract brands are available)? Who decided to position it alongside the stocks and gravies while they put Marmite (see!) with the jams and spreads?

This is a trivial and hopefully fun illustration of why, in the world of data, hierarchies should be approached with care.

Don’t get me wrong. Hierarchies are incredibly useful. Imagine trying to find your Bovril or Marmite if products were placed at the whim of each store manager. However, I would imagine most people involved with Data Management in any line of business can think of examples where hierarchies have also caused confusion or even conflict.

Why?

  • Hierarchy – a group of people or things arranged in order of rank. I would add classifications to that…
  • Classification – a division or category in a system that divides things into groups or types…

So a Classification Hierarchy is an ordered grouping of things and groups / types of things. And that is where the problem starts. How things are grouped together is seldom based on indisputable facts – maybe hierarchies of legal entities is an example, but even then what do you do with 50:50 joint ventures? Classification Hierarchies are artificial. Useful, but artificial.

So what can go wrong?

Don’t assume that there must be only one hierarchy of the same class of data

Take how countries or states / counties are grouped into “regions”. Countries are real. States / counties are real. (And, yes, there generally is a fact-based hierarchy of States/Counties rolling up to Countries … although I am sure someone, somewhere can think if a dispute that may break that rule). But the way States are grouped for Sales Management purposes may be different to how they are Grouped for Logistics Planning purposes. Using the wrong hierarchy for an intended purpose, or assuming that two purposes use the same hierarchy will lead to confusion and issues.

In the world of Finance, I doubt if any two banks have an identical classification scheme for how financial products are grouped into “classes”. Convertible Bonds are an often-quoted example. Do these belong in the Equities business or the Debt business?

Don’t assume that a piece of information can always be found at a consistent level in a hierarchy

An example here would be the level at which budgetary authority sits in an internal business hierarchy. Even if a hierarchy has uniform depth (i.e. it always has the same number of layers from the bottom to the top, as opposed to a ragged hierarchy which doesn’t) it might not be the case that budgetary authority, or any other type of authority, can be found n levels up from the bottom or m levels down from the top. Make sure your systems are not designed with that as a constraint.

Don’t assume that all hierarchies with a similar name have consistent things at the bottom / leaf level

Industry Classification is probably the best example here. As someone once said, “The great thing about standards is there are so many to choose from”. That is certainly the case with Industry Classifications. Across the different standards there are differences in the groupings of groups. But at the lowest level, the most granular, detailed groups that a business could be classified into are not consistent.

Other examples

I am sure many seasoned data professionals will have their own favourite war story of where hierarchies have confused. I would love to hear them.

Remember. Hierarchies are useful. But approach with care!

To hear more about this sign up to attend our upcoming Data Management Summit where Colin will be moderating a panel on ‘Are we talking the same language? Releasing the potential of your data with a business aligned data model

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The evolution of enterprise data management for ESG – managing non-standard and unstructured data

The challenges of sourcing ESG data to meet investment and regulatory requirements are well rehearsed. Managing the data to accelerate sustainability performance is another step forward, with the need to evolve enterprise data management and integrate unstructured and non-standard ESG data. A successful solution typically includes a single, trusted data master based on many sources,...

BLOG

Datactics Makes Data Assets More Valuable with Renewed Augmented Data Quality Solution

Datactics has released the first phase of its renewed Augmented Data Quality (ADQ) solution including an enhanced user interface and a host of new and improved machine learning (ML) microservices to automate data quality activities. The solution also eliminates time and the need for technical knowledge when addressing data quality issues by democratising data quality...

EVENT

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology, London

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology London on September 21st at Marriott Hotel Canary Wharf London examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

ESG Handbook 2023

The ESG Handbook 2023 edition is the essential guide to everything you need to know about ESG and how to manage requirements if you work in financial data and technology. Download your free copy to understand: What ESG Covers: The scope and definition of ESG Regulations: The evolution of global regulations, especially in the UK...