About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FSB Releases Reform Agenda for 2010, Liquidity Risk and Accounting Standards Feature Heavily

Subscribe to our newsletter

Last year saw the transformation and empowerment of the Financial Services Board (FSB) to lead and monitor regulatory coordination across Europe. This year, the regulatory body has a significant list of tasks ahead of it to effectively put this function into practice, including coordinating the implementation of improvements to accounting standards and raising capital and liquidity requirements.

Chairman of the FSB Mario Draghi has long been focused on the area of risk management with regards to revisions to the Basel framework and spent a large proportion of last year raising the profile of these issues. To drive forward this agenda in 2010, the FSB has already conducted its first meeting of the year, on 9 January in Basel. The meeting involved discussions aimed at determining the FSB’s regulatory policy reform agenda for 2010, ranging from compensation practices to accounting rules.

“Further work is essential to address the underlying weaknesses that gave rise to the crisis. Momentum is being maintained towards meeting the clear targets set by G20 leaders for improving financial regulation. Coordination is taking place to achieve consistency across borders and maintain a level playing field,” states the FSB in a recent communication (see below for the full document).

This year the FSB will continue to be focused on the interaction between firms’ risk management cultures and their compensation practices in an attempt to ensure that they are better aligned. To this end, it launched in December 2009 a peer review of implementation of the Principles and Standards for Sound Compensation Practices (see the other release below). The review will focus on the steps being taken or planned by FSB member jurisdictions to ensure effective application of the principles and standards, as well as progress to date in implementation by significant financial institutions.

It is therefore asking for feedback from financial institutions and other stakeholders on practical experiences in implementing the FSB principles and standards, or the related respective national rules. This includes descriptions of how compensation arrangements at financial institutions have changed in practice, in areas such as governance, pay structures or risk adjustments, as well as areas where implementation is proving challenging, and issues of consistency in regulatory responses across sectors and jurisdictions.

Feedback can be submitted by 1 February 2010 to fsb@bis.org under the subject heading “FSB Thematic Peer Review on Compensation” and individual submissions will not be made public. The review is to be completed by March 2010, as requested by G20 Leaders, and the resulting report will be published at that point.

This practical data will not likely include technology considerations but the focus on risk management in general should assist chief risk officers (CROs) and those in the risk function in general in raising the profile of their endeavours. It could secure them extra funding for technology investments to improve risk management and balance out the regulatory and public concerns about risky behaviours related to compensation.

Another FSB agenda item that should assist in this manner is the 2010 focus on bank capital and liquidity requirements, which is based on the Basel Committee’s recent papers on the subject. According to the FSB, the planned quantitative impact assessment of the proposals will take careful account of the cumulative effect of all elements of the proposed Basel II changes. The FSB will assess the macroeconomic implications of the implementation of the proposed regulation and the Basel Committee will then take this assessment into account in framing the appropriate transitional arrangements.

The wide ranging impacts of changes to the Basel framework will include significant investment in risk modelling and analytics systems in order to take into account the revisions. A more enterprise-wide approach to risk management is an expected outcome of all this related work and firms will need the technology and institutional capabilities to gather this risk data together in a comprehensive and timely manner.

Separately, the FSB is also coordinating a number of work streams to assess and propose international policy actions to address system-wide cross border liquidity risks, including the particular issues that arise for emerging markets. Liquidity risk in particular has gained notoriety over recent months due to the implementation of the systems and controls aspects of the UK Financial Services Authority’s (FSA) new reporting regime. The industry can therefore expect similar implementations to be carried out and similar technology readjustments to be required in jurisdictions across the globe in the near future (some considerably sooner than others).

The FSB will also be continuing to monitor global regulatory standards and the consistency of regulation at a global level, in line with its goals identified by the G20. This may cause a degree of international debate with regards to harmonisation at the national level over the course of the year and this could have knock on effects on technology spending as certain jurisdictions may be forced to revise current regulatory reporting requirements.

The same may be true of the FSB’s current drive towards strengthening and harmonising accounting standards at the global level. “FSB members welcomed the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) plan to continue its enhanced technical dialogue with prudential authorities and market regulators on financial institution reporting issues, and to conclude its full review of the financial instruments standard by the end of this year,” states the FSB.

The IASB is currently endeavouring to develop new global accounting standards to improve the decision usefulness and relevance of financial reporting for key stakeholders, including prudential regulators. These standards should add yet more fuel to the fire for those in the pricing and valuations space in terms of investing in data systems and third party data feeds to improve transparency.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content


Recorded Webinar: Taking a holistic approach to buy-side data management

As data volumes and complexity continue to increase, buy-side data management is at an inflection point. Manual processes and data siloes are no longer fit for purpose, and firms need to take a more holistic approach to data management that not only reduces manual intervention and cost, but also increases data access and accuracy for...


Depicting Crypto’s Data Dilemma Before the Next Winter Cold Bites

By Berta Ares Lombán, Head of Digital Assets Financial Information at SIX. The crypto winter, when a basket of leading cryptocurrencies lost around $1.9 trillion in value, put a much-needed spotlight on the long-term future of digital assets. While this is not the first time cryptocurrencies have seen significant adjustments to their valuations, the fallout...


Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 12th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in New York brings together the North American, capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore the evolution of data strategy and how to leverage data to drive compliance and business insight.


Regulatory Data Handbook 2022/2023 – Tenth Edition

Welcome to the tenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a publication that has tracked new regulations, amendments, implementation and data management requirements as regulatory change has impacted global capital markets participants over the past 10 years. This edition of the handbook includes new regulations and highlights some of the major regulatory interventions challenging...