About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Formal Working Groups Needed to Tackle Downstream Data Issues, Say Majority of Readers

Subscribe to our newsletter

Interoperability and integration between downstream systems and centralised data management systems has been an issue for some time and last year’s events have brought it into the spotlight. According to the results of our latest Reference Data Review reader poll it is not just the regulators that are concerned about this area, a lot of you are also keen to tackle the downstream impact of data management projects.

Regulators are focused on the area in particular, with the focus on how counterparty and entity data, for example, is used throughout an organisation. Disconnects between centralised data repositories and the downstream systems that use this data are obviously a source of significant risk for financial institutions. It is in this light that many respondents to our latest reader poll are likely keen to address the area in a formal manner.

A total of 71% of respondents indicated that they believe formal working groups should be established in order to better tackle the issue of downstream data. The idea of informal communication on the subject was not popular, however, with only 7% of respondents wishing to tackle the area in this manner.

The trend towards formal groups established to tackle issues such as these is likely both a reaction to regulatory scrutiny (after all, it would provide proof that the industry is attempting to tackle the area) and recognition that in order to deal with such a complex issue, all parties need to be involved. Only with the establishment of a formal working group can a project such as this hope to get off the ground in a climate of great economic turmoil. Management needs to understand and be on board with any such endeavour in order to make sure it gets the right level of support.

Not everyone, however, believes that downstream systems are worthy of new working groups: 21% of respondents stated that enough attention is being paid to this already. Perhaps, their organisations are one step ahead of the curve with regards to integration, or they have other things on their minds.

Regardless of this minority, interoperability and integration between downstream systems and centralised data management systems is likely to recur as theme over the course of the year, as regulators clamp down on financial institutions’ risk management practices. Hopefully, it will lead to funding for these projects and some of the longstanding back office siloes will be broken down, but as with anything in such a climate, progress is likely to be slow.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Generative and Agentic AI in Financial Markets: What the Data Really Shows

Artificial intelligence is reshaping financial markets – but the reality on the ground is more nuanced, more uneven, and more instructive than the headlines suggest. A new A-Team Insight research programme, drawing on responses from senior AI decision-makers at buy-side and sell-side institutions across the USA, UK and Canada, reveals a market in transition: from...

BLOG

15 Software and Data Vendors Solving Valuation, Integration and Reporting in Alternative Investments

The secular shift towards private markets has transformed alternative asset allocations from an institutional tactical sleeve into a core portfolio driver. Yet behind this expansion lies a stubborn operational bottleneck: alternative asset data remains inherently unstructured, fragmented and delayed. Unlike public equities, where standardised data feeds integrate seamlessly into order management systems, private market data...

EVENT

AI in Data Management Summit New York City

Following the success of the 15th Data Management Summit NYC, A-Team Group are excited to announce our new event: AI in Data Management Summit NYC!

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...