About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Firms Failing to Meet MiFID II Reporting Requirements – Vendors Can Help

Subscribe to our newsletter

We are almost two years on from MiFID II implementation and yet there are still gaping holes where firms continue to struggle with the burden of mandatory reporting requirements brought in by the regulation. Around 50% are not yet monitoring their reporting daily, according to the second annual MiFID II & Best Execution survey from Cappitech, while almost two thirds (61.4%) are failing to monitor best execution, despite this being a key requirement.

The results show that even as we reach the regulation’s second birthday, firms are still struggling with reporting quality and processes. Key challenges include reconciliation, which 44% of firms identified as their primary pain point. Feedback is another – with over two thirds (68%) of respondents reporting that they have not yet received comments on MiFID II compliance from their national regulators. Of the 32% that have, none have yet been fined – but this relaxed approach is unlikely to last forever.

“The survey results point to firms still not being fully comfortable with MiFID II reporting requirements,” says Mark Kelly, author of the report and member of the Cappitech Advisory Board. “At the beginning of 2019, firms had told us that this year would be one of setting KPIs and reviewing data quality, but this process is clearly happening more slowly than anticipated. The use of external analysis and tools to spot problems may alleviate some of these challenges on the basis of ‘don’t mark your own homework’ which will be important as the regulators will start to impose sanctions on firms who are not managing their data appropriately.”

While 68% of firms plan to use existing reporting solutions for future regulatory requirements, a further 64% believe that it is important to have one solution across all reporting regimes, suggesting that there is a gradual move towards an enterprise-wide approach instead of the ‘fill-the-immediate-gaps’ model. But to meet the requirements, as the regulators begin to tighten their approach, it is crucial to engage with the correct counterparties to enable effective oversight.

“We believe that third party providers are a good way to overcome these challenges by providing domain expertise gained through dealing with many similar clients,” comments Ronen Kertis, CEO and Founder of Cappitech. “Using the right vendor also helps address the other clear preference raised by 64% of respondents saying it is important to streamline their reporting obligations by using a single solution or vendor.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Leveraging NLP for regulatory compliance

As regulatory compliance becomes more complex, requires larger volumes of data – both structured and unstructured, and comes under greater scrutiny by regulators, financial institutions are looking for RegTech solutions that can help them increase efficiency, reduce costs, and improve the accuracy of regulatory data. One such solution is natural language processing (NLP), which can...

BLOG

ESMA’s Data Quality Report Signals a Higher Bar for Regulatory Reporting Data

By Michele Hillery, Managing Director, Head of Repository & Derivatives Services at The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC). Regulators across jurisdictions are leveraging trade reporting data as a supervisory resource, using it to monitor risk, assess market activity and inform policy and oversight decisions. As this use becomes more sophisticated, firms face an even...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York

Our TradingTech Summit in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...