About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Financial Crisis Has Focused Institutions on Data Quality Initiatives, Says Information Difference

Subscribe to our newsletter

The recent financial crisis will not deter financial institutions from investing in master data management (MDM) and data quality systems, according to a recent survey conducted by consulting firm the Information Difference and sponsored by Trillium Software. The findings of the survey suggest that these initiatives will be of mounting importance to businesses in the near future, explains Ed Wrazen, vice president of product development and strategy at the enterprise data quality vendor.

The survey was aimed at gaining greater insight into the views and plans of businesses regarding their current or planned MDM and data quality initiatives and the consulting firm spoke to a total of 92 respondents with this goal in mind. It also explored the views of businesses on the impact of the financial crisis and credit crunch on their current and future plans for implementation of these initiatives.

According to Information Difference, the majority of respondents were from North America (57%) and Europe (31%). Most of the respondents were from companies having annual revenues greater than US$1 billion and this was not limited to financial services firms.

Wrazen highlights some of the key findings of the survey to illustrate his point: “While 58% of the companies surveyed have implemented MDM or data quality initiatives, of the 42% remaining: 42% plan to implement data quality and MDM within one to three years and 11% plan to implement data quality within one to three years.”

Moreover, of the 58% who currently are in the process of implementations, 40% told Information Difference that they intend to accelerate or are already accelerating the implementation in the light of the current financial crisis. Out of the total 92 respondents, 50% said that in the light of the financial crisis, implementation of data quality and MDM should be given a higher priority.

“These findings suggest that at least over the next one to three years, MDM and data quality initiatives will be of mounting importance to businesses and, in light of recent events, we would suggest that this is especially true in the financial services sector,” says Wrazen.

The key drivers for investment in this space are primarily being driven by corporate strategy for governance, risk and compliance, increased operational efficiencies and customer information consolidation, he continues. This includes the need to judge and ensure the reliability of risk reference data before using it as a basis for decision making. “Poor data could support a wrong risk decision at a time when the institution is vulnerable and very reliant upon its executives making good, evidence based decisions,” he explains.

It also includes the need to prove to regulators that the data supporting their risk positions is correct and accurate, and to avoid having to make excessive risk capital reserves where risk data is not considered reliable. It results in a reduction of cost overhead and wastage due to inconsistent information and reporting across business units – products, MRO, logistics, supplier management, procurement and finance functions, contends Wrazen.

Moreover, it helps provide know your customer and enhanced customer information and analytics across the enterprise. This can be used for customer data integration and intelligence and avoidance of revenue leakage and incorrect billing, he adds.

According to analysts the Information Difference who conducted the survey the current economic climate has not had a significant impact on budgets for these projects in the short term. Only 9% of respondents said they planned to delay implementation for a year and 8% indicated they planned to put their implementations and plans on hold.

Dave Waddington, senior vice president and head of research at the firm, explains: “There is no substantial move towards delaying current plans, although 23% of those already engaged in implementations have chosen to delay either their data quality and or MDM initiatives. Indeed of those businesses that have already implemented, 40% have elected to accelerate their rollout. In terms of the overall picture, only 8% suggest that they have put their plans on hold. This suggests no major retrenchment in rollout and adoption plans, which is positive news for integrators and vendors.”

This seems to indicate that MDM and data quality initiatives thus far have achieved some level of immunity from the current financial crisis. How long this remains the case is yet to be discovered.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Generative and Agentic AI in Financial Markets: What the Data Really Shows

Artificial intelligence is reshaping financial markets – but the reality on the ground is more nuanced, more uneven, and more instructive than the headlines suggest. A new A-Team Insight research programme, drawing on responses from senior AI decision-makers at buy-side and sell-side institutions across the USA, UK and Canada, reveals a market in transition: from...

BLOG

Asian KYB Requires Live Registry Data, Not Another Database: AsiaVerify CEO

Asian know-your-business (KYB) controls have an uncomfortable blind spot: firms can spend heavily on onboarding, sanctions screening and case management while still making decisions from corporate records that may be weeks or months out of date – and sometimes more. AsiaVerify CEO Leas Bachatene spoke with RegTech Insight about the KYB challenges for firms with...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, Fall, New York, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 8th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...