About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Fed’s Bernanke Champions Mark to Market But Says Illiquid Securities Issue Needs Resolution

Subscribe to our newsletter

Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke has added his voice to the debate about mark to market accounting rules this week. Bernanke is in favour of the controversial accounting rules, which require companies to write down assets every quarter to reflect market value, but cautions that regulators urgently need to deal with the issues surrounding the valuation of illiquid assets.

The Fed chairman believes the rules are good in principle but raised some of his concerns with the House Financial Services Committee earlier this week: “I don’t see a suspension of the whole system as being constructive, because there is a great deal of information in valuing many of these assets. Accounting authorities have a great deal of work to do to try to figure out how to deal with some of these assets, which are not traded in liquid markets.”

Assets that aren’t readily traded due to illiquid markets cause problems for mark to market valuations because there aren’t enough prices available to determine the real value of assets.

Earlier this month, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) said that it would be revisiting mark to market accounting standards, the American Bankers Association (ABA) has spoken up about some concerns it has about the FASB approach. The association feels that issues underlying the controversial accounting rules are not being taken into account by the FASB, especially with regards to other than temporary impairment (OTTI).

The FASB has launched new projects aimed at improving the measurement and disclosure of fair value estimates in response to calls for more disclosure, as well as recommendations made by the Securities and Exchange Commission in its mark to market accounting study, released last year. However, despite its welcoming of the projects to review and reconcile the process for estimating mark to market values in illiquid markets, the ABA is worried that more should be done.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: End-to-End Lineage for Financial Services: The Missing Link for Both Compliance and AI Readiness

The importance of complete robust end-to-end data lineage in financial services and capital markets cannot be overstated. Without the ability to trace and verify data across its lifecycle, many critical workflows – from trade reconciliation to risk management – cannot be executed effectively. At the top of the list is regulatory compliance. Regulators demand a...

BLOG

Why Do We Disagree? How AI Solves One of Post-Trade’s Most Persistent Challenges

By Carl Thornberg, head of optimisation and analytics technology, OSTTRA. In post-trade operations, most problems are not caused by outright errors, they are caused by ambiguity. Trades that look different but are not wrong. Valuations that diverge for valid reasons. Numbers that do not line up, even though nothing has actually gone awry. At scale,...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

Solvency II Data Management Handbook

Want to get a handle on Solvency II and what it means for data management? Need to make sure you have all the bases covered for the looming January 2016 deadline? Our Solvency II Data Management Handbook is now available for free download to help you. This Handbook is the ultimate guide to all things...