About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FCA Highlights Good and Bad Practice Across Five Areas of Algorithmic Trading

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a report on the supervision of algorithmic trading that focuses on five areas of algo trading compliance and highlights good and bad practice observed from cross-firm reviews.

The FCA report coincides with publication of a consultation paper by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) on proposed expectations regarding a firm’s governance and risk management of algorithmic trading. The FCA and PRA will work together to ensure a coordinated approach going forward.

The FCA report considers the use of algorithms for a number of purposes across trading activity, including Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II. It notes that while automated technology brings significant benefits to investors, including increased execution speed and reduced costs, it can also amplify risk, making it essential that key oversight functions, including compliance and risk management, keep pace with technological advancements.

The five areas of focus and key objectives, based on the FCA’s review findings, and with consideration of MIFID II requirements, cover:

  • Defining algorithmic trading
    Key objective: To ensure firms establish an appropriate process to identify algorithmic trading, manage material changes and maintain a comprehensive inventory of algorithmic trading across the business
  • Development and testing
    Key objective: To ensure firms maintain robust, consistent and well understood development and testing processes that identify potential issues across trading algorithms prior to full deployment
  • Risk controls
    Key objective: To ensure firms develop suitable and robust pre- and post-trade controls to monitor, identify and reduce potential trading risks across algorithmic trading activity
  • Governance and oversight
    Key objective: To ensure firms maintain an appropriate governance and oversight framework that demonstrates effective challenge from senior management, risk management and compliance on algorithmic trading activities
  • Market conduct
    Key objective: To ensure firms appropriately consider the potential impact of their algorithmic trading on market integrity, monitor for potential conduct issues and reduce market abuse risks.

Megan Butler, director of supervision, investment, wholesale and specialist, at the FCA, says: “This report is relevant for all firms developing and using algorithmic trading strategies in wholesale markets. Firms should consider and act on its content in the context of good practice for their business.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Best practices for compliance with EU Market Abuse Regulation

Date: 18 June 2024 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) came into force in July 2016, rescinding the previous Market Abuse Directive and replacing it with a significantly extended scope of regulatory obligations. Eight years later, and amid constant change in capital markets regulation,...

BLOG

MENA – A Compelling Capital Markets Destination

As the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region undergoes a significant evolution from its traditional reliance on oil revenues to establishing itself as a dynamic financial market, exchanges and market intermediaries in the region are embracing advanced technologies to support their burgeoning financial services ecosystems. For international firms looking to take advantage of this...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 14th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions Europe 2010

The European corporate actions market could be the stage of some pretty heavy duty discussions regarding standards going forward, particularly with regards to the adoption of both XBRL tagging and ISO 20022 messaging. The region’s issuer community, for one, is not going to be easy to convince of the benefits of XBRL tags, given the...