About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FCA Highlights Good and Bad Practice Across Five Areas of Algorithmic Trading

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a report on the supervision of algorithmic trading that focuses on five areas of algo trading compliance and highlights good and bad practice observed from cross-firm reviews.

The FCA report coincides with publication of a consultation paper by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) on proposed expectations regarding a firm’s governance and risk management of algorithmic trading. The FCA and PRA will work together to ensure a coordinated approach going forward.

The FCA report considers the use of algorithms for a number of purposes across trading activity, including Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II. It notes that while automated technology brings significant benefits to investors, including increased execution speed and reduced costs, it can also amplify risk, making it essential that key oversight functions, including compliance and risk management, keep pace with technological advancements.

The five areas of focus and key objectives, based on the FCA’s review findings, and with consideration of MIFID II requirements, cover:

  • Defining algorithmic trading
    Key objective: To ensure firms establish an appropriate process to identify algorithmic trading, manage material changes and maintain a comprehensive inventory of algorithmic trading across the business
  • Development and testing
    Key objective: To ensure firms maintain robust, consistent and well understood development and testing processes that identify potential issues across trading algorithms prior to full deployment
  • Risk controls
    Key objective: To ensure firms develop suitable and robust pre- and post-trade controls to monitor, identify and reduce potential trading risks across algorithmic trading activity
  • Governance and oversight
    Key objective: To ensure firms maintain an appropriate governance and oversight framework that demonstrates effective challenge from senior management, risk management and compliance on algorithmic trading activities
  • Market conduct
    Key objective: To ensure firms appropriately consider the potential impact of their algorithmic trading on market integrity, monitor for potential conduct issues and reduce market abuse risks.

Megan Butler, director of supervision, investment, wholesale and specialist, at the FCA, says: “This report is relevant for all firms developing and using algorithmic trading strategies in wholesale markets. Firms should consider and act on its content in the context of good practice for their business.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

Date: 7 May 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional...

BLOG

The Great Convergence: How AI, Data, and Open Platforms Are Redefining the O/EMS

For decades, the Order Management System (OMS) and the Execution Management System (EMS) occupied distinct roles within the trading process; the OMS handling the full order lifecycle, from creation to post-trade processing and compliance, and the EMS managing real-time order execution, routing, and optimisation across markets and venues. Today, a powerful convergence is reshaping this...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

The Global LEI System – Slow but Sure

After what looked like a slow start to the summer, the initiative to establish a global standard for legal entity identifiers (LEIs) took a series of significant leaps forward during August, that appears to have put the project firmly back on track. If the marketplace felt a little reticent in June and July, it could...