About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FCA Discusses Progress on MiFID II Policy and Practicalities of Implementation

Subscribe to our newsletter

Details on final requirements and the implementation of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) will continue to be published over coming months, leading the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to conclude that serious efforts must be made towards achieving compliance on the 3 January 2018 deadline, although perfection is not expected.

Stephen Hanks, markets policy at the FCA, discussed progress on policy and the practicalities of implementing MiFID II at A-Team’s Intelligent Trading Summit in London last week. He noted the extent of the legislation – 1,500 pages, plus 50 pages of guidelines – and set out a timeline for updates on the regulation.

Considering European Union policy, Hanks said the European Commission is expected to adopt MiFID II final implementing measures later this month or in March, although it could be mid-year before all implementation pieces of the regulation are finished. Equivalency measures on share trading obligations are being written into final Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), while details on financial derivatives trading obligations may not be ready in time for the January 2018 deadline.

Looking at UK policy, Hanks noted that the FCA’s most recent industry consultation on MiFID II is nearly complete and will be followed by policy statements in March and June. From a practical perspective, the FCA opened the MiFID II authorisations gateway for authorised organisations and new applications from organisations such as organised trading facilities (OTFs), commodities dealers and data reporting service providers in late January. A gateway for passporting notifications will open towards the end of July. Hanks commented that if firms need to be authorised as prescribed by MiFID II, they should submit their applications as soon as possible.

The FCA’s concerns about the implementation of MiFID II include the regulation’s potential barrier to technology, as technology can bring about change and competition, but also the need to ensure technology control and resilience. As the FCA is not only a financial services register, but also a competition regulator, Hanks noted the authority’s need to understand the implications of disruptive technology and consider its impact on consumers. He also touched on the challenge of big data and the need for regulators to update systems to cope with huge volumes of data and gain more information from the data, such as a clear view of market stability.

Reverting to outstanding issues on the MiFID II timeline, Hank said a Q&A can be expected from ESMA on the scope of direct electronic access in March. More information on the equities double volume cap is due in the next few weeks, although the systematic internaliser regime may not start until January 2018. On non-equities, Hank said the FCA would detail transparency requirements in its policy statement in March, and expects ESMA to have more to say on OTFs as applications for authorisation are made.

Considering reporting, the FCA anticipates more information from ESMA as firms move to the MiFID II transaction reporting regime. Best execution reporting will start on a best endeavours basis when the regulation takes effect in January 2018.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Navigating the Build vs Buy Dilemma: Cloud Strategies for Accelerating Quantitative Research

Date: 20 May 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes For many quantitative trading firms and asset managers, building a self-provisioned historical market data environment remains one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps in establishing a new research capability. Sourcing data, normalising symbologies, handling corporate actions and maintaining...

BLOG

Re-Architecting Regulatory Reporting with REGnosys and Open Source

Regulatory reporting has long been defined by highly specialized jurisdictional knowledge, templates, spreadsheets, and a significant part of the compliance budget. Regulators publish new requirements, firms interpret them independently, technology teams build extraction and transformation layers, and operations teams reconcile outputs before pushing formatted datasets to supervisory authorities. RegTech Insight sat down with regulatory reporting...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Practical Applications of the Global LEI – Client On-Boarding and Beyond

The time for talking is over. The time for action is now. A bit melodramatic, perhaps, but given last month’s official launch of the global legal entity identifier (LEI) standard, practitioners are rolling up their sleeves and getting on with figuring out how to incorporate the new identifier into their customer and entity data infrastructures....