About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FCA Discusses Progress on MiFID II Policy and Practicalities of Implementation

Subscribe to our newsletter

Details on final requirements and the implementation of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) will continue to be published over coming months, leading the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to conclude that serious efforts must be made towards achieving compliance on the 3 January 2018 deadline, although perfection is not expected.

Stephen Hanks, markets policy at the FCA, discussed progress on policy and the practicalities of implementing MiFID II at A-Team’s Intelligent Trading Summit in London last week. He noted the extent of the legislation – 1,500 pages, plus 50 pages of guidelines – and set out a timeline for updates on the regulation.

Considering European Union policy, Hanks said the European Commission is expected to adopt MiFID II final implementing measures later this month or in March, although it could be mid-year before all implementation pieces of the regulation are finished. Equivalency measures on share trading obligations are being written into final Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), while details on financial derivatives trading obligations may not be ready in time for the January 2018 deadline.

Looking at UK policy, Hanks noted that the FCA’s most recent industry consultation on MiFID II is nearly complete and will be followed by policy statements in March and June. From a practical perspective, the FCA opened the MiFID II authorisations gateway for authorised organisations and new applications from organisations such as organised trading facilities (OTFs), commodities dealers and data reporting service providers in late January. A gateway for passporting notifications will open towards the end of July. Hanks commented that if firms need to be authorised as prescribed by MiFID II, they should submit their applications as soon as possible.

The FCA’s concerns about the implementation of MiFID II include the regulation’s potential barrier to technology, as technology can bring about change and competition, but also the need to ensure technology control and resilience. As the FCA is not only a financial services register, but also a competition regulator, Hanks noted the authority’s need to understand the implications of disruptive technology and consider its impact on consumers. He also touched on the challenge of big data and the need for regulators to update systems to cope with huge volumes of data and gain more information from the data, such as a clear view of market stability.

Reverting to outstanding issues on the MiFID II timeline, Hank said a Q&A can be expected from ESMA on the scope of direct electronic access in March. More information on the equities double volume cap is due in the next few weeks, although the systematic internaliser regime may not start until January 2018. On non-equities, Hank said the FCA would detail transparency requirements in its policy statement in March, and expects ESMA to have more to say on OTFs as applications for authorisation are made.

Considering reporting, the FCA anticipates more information from ESMA as firms move to the MiFID II transaction reporting regime. Best execution reporting will start on a best endeavours basis when the regulation takes effect in January 2018.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practice approaches to data management for regulatory reporting

Effective regulatory reporting requires firms to manage vast amounts of data across multiple systems, regions, and regulatory jurisdictions. With increasing scrutiny from regulators and the rising complexity of financial instruments, the need for a streamlined and strategic approach to data management has never been greater. Financial institutions must ensure accuracy, consistency, and timeliness in their...

BLOG

Regulators Stay Tough: Why Surveillance Matters in 2025

By Paul Cottee, Director, Regulatory Compliance, NICE Actimize. A common question has arisen in recent conversations and at conferences. Now that major U.S. regulators have new leaders and enforcement heads in place, will enforcement actions slow down both in the United States and around the world? In other words, can financial institutions ease surveillance efforts? ...

EVENT

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology London examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

The DORA Implementation Playbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Demonstrating Resilience Beyond the Deadline

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) has fundamentally reshaped the European Union’s financial regulatory landscape, with its full application beginning on January 17, 2025. This regulation goes beyond traditional risk management, explicitly acknowledging that digital incidents can threaten the stability of the entire financial system. As the deadline has passed, the focus is now shifting...