About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FCA Criticism of Funds’ SDR Approach Stirs Controversy

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK regulator has criticised fund managers for failing to abide by interim guidance on ESG disclosures just days before it’s expected to announce details of a formal regulation.

But the comments have been met with frustration and caution within the ESG data and technology community, with one practitioner arguing that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) report casts an unfair light on ESG analysts and research.

The FCA said it had identified shortcomings in many financial firms’ application of its “guiding principles” on reporting ESG performance. Among them, it said, fund managers had omitted or failed to explain key sustainability information in fund documentation.

The FCA statement came in a review of its deliberations over proposals for a formal sustainable disclosure regulation (SDR), publication of which is expected before the end of the year.

The criticism was not received well by stewardship solutions provider Minerva Analytics, whose chief executive Sarah Wilson said the FCA had displayed “inconsistency”. She compared the FCA’s latest observations with the UK’s stance on other regulations such as the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), which the government wants to partially reverse.

“This is a strange situation isn’t it?” Wilson told ESG Insight. “On the one hand MiFID and regulation of investment research has been deemed a ‘bad thing’ and must be rolled back, but on the other hand, ESG is a ‘bad thing’ and must be regulated, even though it’s clearly trying to do something good.

“There’s, therefore, an inconsistency with the FCA which worries me – we’ve just ended up with a lot of extra costs and our clients have had to pick that up.”

Guiding Principles

The FCA’s guiding principles are intended to put fund managers’ ESG reporting responsibilities in a holding pattern before formal SDRs are implemented. The principles stress that firms must be transparent in the design of their funds, providing clear disclosure of the sustainable elements within them. They must also deliver their funds in a responsible way, ensuring that they keep to their green mandates. And finally, firms must make pre-contractual and periodic disclosures about their funds.

“A review by the FCA has found that while most Authorised Fund Managers (AFMs) have made efforts to comply with the FCA’s expectations on the design, delivery, and disclosure of their ESG and sustainable funds, further improvement is needed,” it wrote in the review, published at the end of last week.

Its criticism was focused on inconsistencies in funds’ alignments with their sustainability goals; an inability among some managers to articulate the sustainability of their products; and, a lack of clear stewardship.

Why Now?

The comments paint a picture of an industry in need of stronger regulation than many observers think necessary.

“The question has to be – why this action, why now, who benefits and who is being harmed?” said Wilson. “I’ve yet to see any evidence of bad behaviour by ESG analysts – the overwhelming majority are hard-working, dedicated and deeply committed individuals who care passionately about doing the right thing.”

Investment management software provider NeoXam was more sanguine. The Paris-based company, whose clients have €20 trillion (US$21.8tn) under management, said the solution for non-compliant fund managers would be found in better ESG data and technology provisions.

Yann Bloch, head of product and pre-sales for the Americas, said that the adoption of systems that increased investment transparency would enable firms to comply with approaching regulations.

“Many firms will be reliant on legacy systems, or have data scattered all across the business in spreadsheets – you’d think that as we are nearing the quarter-mark of the 21st century, people would have learned that this kind of approach is a recipe for disaster,” Bloch told ESG Insight. “Information becomes incredibly difficult to track down, and what it means is that firms are not efficiently or effectively utilising much of the data that they purchase and consume.

“We are seeing more emphasis put on the importance of transparency and reporting by regulators globally though, not just when it comes to ESG investing,” he added. “This, among other factors, is helping to drive firms towards embracing modern technology solutions that are ultimately there to help deliver value across the business.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Managing Non-Financial Misconduct Under SMCR

9 October 2025 11:00am ET | 3:00pm London | 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 Minutes Non-financial misconduct—encompassing behaviours such as bullying, sexual harassment, and discrimination is a key focus of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has underscored that such misconduct is not only unethical but also poses significant risks...

BLOG

AI in Capital Markets Summit NYC 2025: Seats Filling Fast – Book Now

Following a successful second event in London, the AI in Capital Markets Summit (AICMS) arrives in New York City for the first time on June 26, 2025, to advance the critical industry conversation about artificial intelligence – from experimentation to production. Hosted by A-Team Group at @Ease on Third Avenue, this timely event is a...

EVENT

TradingTech Briefing New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...