About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Existing Regulation Could Spur On Corporate Actions STP, Aite Predicts

Subscribe to our newsletter

The lack of an explicit regulatory imperative to address the efficiency of corporate actions processing is often cited as a reason for the industry’s lack of progress towards this goal. While it’s true that efforts like Giovannini do include corporate actions, there is no specific directive or legislation that demands firms meet a standard for corporate actions STP. And there is also some confusion about the implications of different industry-wide efforts to effect improved corporate actions efficiency – about the overlap between, say, how Euroclear’s move to a single platform impacts corporate actions, and the work of the Securities Market Practice Group to instil best practices in this area.

While making this point, a new report from analyst Aite Group – Corporate Actions Market Overview: The Back Office Comes to the Fore – also makes the interesting observation that corporate actions could come under the scope of some existing and powerful regulation. The analyst speculates for example that if the best execution element of MiFID were to be extended even if just in spirit to corporate actions processing then an important customer service angle could come into play. Asset owners might start to demand of their asset servicers the best performance possible when it comes to corporate actions, in the same way as clients can now demand best execution for trades from their counterparties. Aite also points out that the Transparency Directive will impose best practices on at least the proxy voting element of corporate actions. Additionally, the analyst makes the point – which has also been made elsewhere – that there is an increasing demand from the front office for more timely and accurate information about corporate actions. This too could push firms to improve corporate actions processing, and relates to efforts we’ve seen recently from data vendors to provide more frequent updates of corporate event information.

Overall, Aite reckons, these factors are helping corporate actions to shed their reputation as a boring back office concern and climb right up firms’ agendas.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

Most City Mega Mergers Test Tech More Than Balance Sheets

By Gus Sekhon, head of product, FINBOURNE Technology. The City loves nothing more than a takeover tale as old as time. A US$2.5tn US asset management behemoth snapping up one of London’s most historic investment houses for £10bn sounds like a story of global ambition and deep pockets. The Schroders brand stays, the headquarters remains...

EVENT

TEST Event page 1

Now in its 15th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions

Corporate actions has been a popular topic of discussion over the last few months, with the DTCC’s plans for XBRL and ISO interoperability, as well as the launch of Swift’s new self-testing service for corporate actions messaging, STaQS, among others. However, it has not been a good start to the year for many of the...