About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ESMA Says Implement MiFID II with Draft Rules, FIX Calls for Clarity

Subscribe to our newsletter

If you missed the FIX EMEA event last week, there is something you need to know – while the final details of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) have not yet been ironed out and the directive’s final rules are not yet published in the Official Journal of the European Journal, there is no getting away from the fact that the rules will be legally binding on January 3, 2018, that regulators will not look lightly on breaches, and that asset managers claiming to be outside the scope of the rules need to make a reality check.

‘Dealing with MiFID II in a Global Regulatory Framework’ was the focus of a FIX EMEA panel with speakers including Rodrigo Buenaventura, head of markets department at the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA); Matthew Coupe, co-chair of the regional committee and EMEA regulatory subcommittee at FIX Trading Community, and a director at Barclays Investment Bank; Philippe Guillot, executive director, markets directorate, Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF); Rebecca Healey, co-chair of the EMEA regulatory subcommittee at FIX Trading Community, and head of EMEA market structure and strategy at Liquidnet; and Dr Kay Swinburne, MEP for Wales.

The regulators on the panel acknowledged that while there are still items to adjust in the Level 2 standards for MiFID II and that final rules have not yet been legally adopted, firms should prepare for compliance using the draft rules.

Issues still requiring detail include whether OTC derivatives will be considered as trading on a trading venue, plans and processes to make ISINs work for derivatives, and a Unique Product Identifier (UPI) that may or may not be an ISIN. Proportionality and equivalence also require further input and review.

From the market participant perspective, panel members discussed the enormity of MiFID II, suggesting it may be better as five or six pieces of legislation, but were confident that both the legislation and industry response would improve over time with better clarity and data. Compliance will not be perfect on January 3, 2018, but it will evolve over time.

Reflecting audience polls showing that 70% of respondents don’t believe they have enough information to implement MiFID II today and 79% saying the impact of MiFID II on market structure is their key concern, the panel closed with a call from FIX to the regulators to provide access to experts and consider a better mechanism than Q&As to answer market participants’ questions in a more real-time manner.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: GenAI and LLM case studies for Surveillance, Screening and Scanning

As Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) move from pilot to production, compliance, surveillance, and screening functions are seeing tangible results – and new risks. From trade surveillance to adverse media screening to policy and regulatory scanning, GenAI and LLMs promise to tackle complexity and volume at a scale never seen before. But...

BLOG

The Data Year Ahead: AI Comes of Age, Private Markets Become Less Opaque

2026 is set to be the year in which the evolutionary changes hinted in the past 12 months become established within the data landscape, according to expert predictions. Artificial intelligence will mature into the game-changing innovation it has promised for years and private markets, whose growth in importance in the past few years has been...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Valuations – Toward On-Demand Evaluated Pricing

Risk and regulatory imperatives are demanding access to the latest portfolio information, placing new pressures on the pricing and valuation function. And the front office increasingly wants up-to-date valuations of hard-to-price securities. These developments are driving a push toward on-demand evaluated pricing capabilities, with pricing teams seeking to provide access to valuations at higher frequency...