About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Derivatives Service Bureau Delays Implementation of Unique Product Identifier

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Derivatives Service Bureau (DSB) has delayed implementation of the Unique Product Identifier (UPI), which was initially due to go live in Q3 2022, but will now be implemented in response to regulatory mandates, the first of which is expected to come from the CFTC in November 2023.

The decision to delay implementation and wait for a regulatory mandate is based on covering the costs of the identifier, although plans are in place, but not yet confirmed, to finalise and publish UPI product templates 15 months ahead of the first regulatory reporting mandate, along with UPI technical specifications for API connectivity.

A user acceptance and integration testing environment, as well as user onboarding, are expected to go live nine months ahead of the first regulatory reporting mandate, with a UPI production system available and able to create, search and report live UPIs three months ahead of a regulatory mandate. This, says the DSB, should allow users plenty of time for testing and getting the UPI into production on time to meet a mandate.

“UPI implementation is on track and waiting for an official mandate,” says Emma Kalliomaki, managing director of the Association of National Numbering Agencies (ANNA) and the DSB. “The CFTC is expected to provide a 12-month notice period towards the end of 2022 and mandate use of the UPI in November 2023.

“The EU and UK are a waiting game, although they have indicated an 18 month lead time, suggesting the US will lead on implementation, followed by the EU and UK. Regulatory authorities in Australia and Japan are indicating a similar timeframe.”

The UPI is designed to facilitate effective aggregation of OTC derivatives transaction reports on a global basis. In the first instance, it will be used to uniquely identify the product involved in an OTC derivatives transaction that an authority requires, or may require in the future, to be reported to a trade repository. Longer term, the UPI will work in conjunction with Unique Transaction Identifiers (UTIs) and Critical Data Elements (CDE) that are also expected to be reportable to global regulatory authorities.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The ROI of Data Trust: Quantifying the Business Value of Data Observability

Data is the fuel that keeps modern financial institutions’ motors running but if that data can’t be trusted then the decisions made based upon it, or the uses to which its put, will be compromised. That’s especially important for data that’s fed into artificial intelligence models. If the data isn’t clean, accurate and complete, then...

BLOG

Data Firms Responding as AI Seen Driving Sovereignty Concern

While the criticality of data to financial institutions has made its security paramount, the internationalisation of that information has made it a strategic priority. With ever greater volumes of data criss-crossing the world within and between organisations’ systems, data sovereignty has become a key component of governance policies required by regulators. Once considered relevant to...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 16th year, Data Management Summit (DMS) NYC returns on September 17th 2026, to explore how to use data and AI to drive measurable business outcomes – reliably, repeatedly and at scale.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...