About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Cusip Global Services Collaboration with DTCC in LEI System Brings Association of National Numbering Agencies into Play

Subscribe to our newsletter

Collaboration between Cusip Global Services (CGS) and DTCC to augment the latter’s role as a pre-Local Operating Unit in the global legal entity identifier (LEI) system brings the Association of National Numbering Agencies (Anna) back into play in LEI development. CGS is not only the issuer of Cusip numbers covering securities, issuers, obligors and guarantors, but also the US National Numbering Agency (NNA).

Anna was part of a proposal for a global LEI system made by Sifma and the GSMA at the end of 2011 and reiterated the following June. It was also highlighted last year by DTCC as a means of creating a federated model of LOUs, but to date it has not had a fixed role in the LEI scheme.

CGS’s agreement with DTCC requires CGS to develop an interface to the utility set up by DTCC to issue Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Interim Compliant Identifiers (CICIs).

This is due to be operational in April and CGS will then be able to offer issuers the ability to apply for both Cusip numbers and CICIs simultaneously through a single interface. This is expected to reduce time and effort in obtaining CICIs and also support wider adoption of the identifiers that will, ultimately, become part of the global LEI system. The platform is also intended to help insurance companies and their counterparty issuers meet regulations from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners on the use of LEIs in transaction and position reporting.

Scott Preiss, vice president of CGS, says CGS and DTCC had been chatting about collaboration for some time before accelerating the conversation at the end of last year. CGS also considered setting up its own pre-LOU, but decided collaboration with an existing registration infrastructure was a better way forward.

“Given our role in providing unique identification for instruments, their issuers and obligors, as well as our active role in legal entity standards development, partnering with the CICI utility at this time makes perfect sense. We are confident that global market participants will be the beneficiary of the collaboration,” says Preiss.

Ron Jordan, DTCC managing director and chief data officer, adds: “We are pleased to join CGS in this endeavour and look forward to providing users with an integrated and efficient approach to assigning CICIs.”

CICIs issued by CGS will be validated at the CICI utility in the same way that DTCC issued CICIs are validated, registered and delivered. They will also follow the exact same principles set down by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and used by DTCC to cover operation on a cost recovery basis and making LEIs and associated data publicly available, free of charge and free of restrictions on redistribution.

“Investment banks, broker-dealers and others who are already used to submitting legal documents to get a Cusip number at instrument and issuer level will be able to use the new interface to apply for a CICI at the same time and, if they so desire, get both codes through the common interface,” explains Preiss.

The collaboration expands the scope of DTCC’s pre-LOU, which is expected to become an LOU as the LEI system develops. It also provides an example of how NNAs in different jurisdictions could play a part in the global system. In line with the FSB’s June 2012 report, where it stated ‘LOUs could build on local business registry or numbering services to maximize the utilisation of local infrastructure’, Anna chairman Dan Kuhnel, says: “The CGS-DTCC collaboration is an extremely important step forward along the continuum to a successfully managed and globally accepted LEI. This illustration of cooperation serves as a potential model for how local NNAs can contribute their local market expertise, issuer relationships and federated Anna network connections within the context of the utility.”

DTCC has issued about 50,000 CICIs to date and while Preiss says it is difficult to say what the balance will be in issuance between DTCC and CGS, he does note that the CGS database is comprised of hundreds of thousands of issuers and entities and the vast majority of these will, in time need a CICI or LEI.

Meanwhile, CGS joins DTCC in issuing CICIs ahead of the requirement for all swap counterparties subject to CFTC jurisdiction to have self-registered or self-certified CICIs by April 10, 2013.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: The Data Office at a Crossroads — AI Governance, Organisational Design, and the Evolving Mandate of the CDO

Date: 28 July 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Who owns AI governance in a capital markets firm – and is the Data Office structured to bear that weight? These questions sit at the heart of A-Team Research’s latest findings, presented here for the first time: the combined...

BLOG

Reconciliation No Longer Has Time On Its Side as T+1 Approaches

By John Bevil, senior product manager at Xceptor. Europe’s capital markets firms are entering the most consequential phase of T+1 preparation. From 11 October 2027, trades executed in European markets are expected to settle one business day after trade date, reducing the settlement cycle from T+2 to T+1. More than 4 trillion euros of securities...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 15th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

FRTB Special Report

FRTB is one of the most sweeping and transformative pieces of regulation to hit the financial markets in the last two decades. With the deadline confirmed as January 2022, this Special Report provides a detailed insight into exactly what the data requirements are for FRTB in its latest (and final) incarnation, and explores what needs to be done in order to meet these needs on a cost-effective and company-wide basis.