About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Consortium with the Enemy

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Dan Barnes

Capital markets are built on the bones of old consortia. Now, the revolution expected of securities markets from the adoption of distributed ledger (DL) or blockchain technology, which offers transparent and irrefutable transaction chains, is in the hands of five such groups, many with common members. Blockchain could make some industry processes redundant. Those processes are a cost for some and a profitable business for others. Therefore its use has political implications.

The global head of trading at one of the UK’s largest investment manager asked, “Are investment banks getting involved with blockchain so they can control the pace of change?” at the European Electronic Bond Trading Conference event held by Euromoney on 12 September 2016. The answer from the stage was “Yes – in many cases.”

Consortium-led projects have a chequered history. The Global Straight-Through-Processing Association (GSTPA), was a viable project run by brokers, asset managers and custodians designed to reduce settlement time. In 2000, US post-trade giant The Depositary Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) having been selected as part of the GSTPA consortium stood down from the project citing a conflict of interest and later announced it was teaming up with Thomson Reuters to offer a rival system which became post-trade hub Omgeo.

There was a considerable crossover between DTCC’s board, GSTPA members and Thomson Reuter’s sell-side clients. In 2002 the GSTPA collapsed with little support from many of its members and costs being written off. Omgeo is now fully owned by the DTCC which bought out Thomson Reuters in 2013.

The consensus needed in such projects inevitably slows the pace of change. Target 2 for Securities (T2S), a cross-border settlement efficiency drive led by the European Central Bank, represents an idea conceived of in a 2001 report and initiated in 2006. Its efficiencies will remove commercial opportunities from and increase competition between custodian banks and central securities depositories, while also requiring their cooperation. With a completion date of 2017, it will have taken the same time as is needed to conceive a human child and raise them through to maturity and secondary education.

Many sell-side consortia projects, including multilateral trading facility (MTF) Turquoise and messaging platform Symphony, have been established directly to compete with a system that has a perceived dominant grip on a sell-side cost base – the London Stock Exchange and Bloomberg respectively.

On occasion sell-side consortium ownership drive can drive efficiency – the DTCC itself is industry owned and has become a post-trade utility in the US though acquisition.

The plus side

Blockchain is a transaction system, requiring common standards. The efficiencies it offers by removing the need to double check different ledgers could reduce annual bank costs by over US$20 billion by 2022, according to research by Santander, Oliver Wyman and Anthemis.

Consensus by consortium is needed to make one work. Many sell-side firms are simultaneously funding and / or supporting multiple DL development groups including: DAH; the Hyperledger Project (HLP); Post-Trade Distributed Ledger Project; the R3 Consortium; and ‘utility settlement coin’ which was developed by broker UBS and is now supported by BNY Mellon, Deutsche Bank, ICAP and Santander. Some of these consortia – such as HLP – are non-commercial and supported by the commercial firms.

With choice comes delay. Blockchain could be like GSTPA – indecision may lead to a useful tool emerging commercially without the mutualisation of cost. It could be a T2S, with firms reluctant to relinquish control of their profitable if inefficient back offices, migration may be slow. It may be a Turquoise or Symphony, used by one part of the business to leverage down costs in another.

How it plays out will be a choice made by the consortia members. The industry can change, but it must want to change.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Re-architecting the trading platform for interoperability, resilience and profitability

Trading platforms have come a long way since the days of exchanging paper certificates and shouting across trading floors, pits and desks in the early 2000s, but there is progress still to be made as firms strive to reduce risk, increase profitability, and make their mark in digital assets trading. This webinar will review the...

BLOG

Genesis Global Launches Web Version of Trade Allocation Manager

Genesis Global, the low-code application development framework provider, has unveiled the web version of its Trade Allocation Manager (TAM), a multi-asset class middle-office solution designed to streamline operations and ensure regulatory compliance for financial markets firms. The TAM web application, built on the Genesis Application Development Platform, promises operational efficiency through the automation of trade...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

The AI in Capital Markets Summit will explore current and emerging trends in AI, the potential of Generative AI and LLMs and how AI can be applied for efficiencies and business value across a number of use cases, in the front and back office of financial institutions. The agenda will explore the risks and challenges of adopting AI and the foundational technologies and data management capabilities that underpin successful deployment.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions

Corporate actions has been a popular topic of discussion over the last few months, with the DTCC’s plans for XBRL and ISO interoperability, as well as the launch of Swift’s new self-testing service for corporate actions messaging, STaQS, among others. However, it has not been a good start to the year for many of the...