About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

CESR’s Ratings Agency Consultation Paper Sets Out CRA Data Requirements

Subscribe to our newsletter

Following more than a year of discussions about how to best tackle the underlying issues with credit ratings in the post-crisis environment, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) has produced a new consultation paper detailing the data requirements for these ratings agencies under the new regime of heavier scrutiny. Industry participants have until the 18 June to provide feedback to CESR about the new requirements, which include details about the typical set of information competent authorities may request from credit ratings agencies (CRAs) on an ongoing basis.

“Competent authorities will typically require CRAs to provide a set of standard information and data as part of ongoing supervision. This may include rating transactions, methodology changes but also activity reports, board minutes as well as any changes to the organisation,” notes the consultation paper. This is in keeping with the general bent within the regulatory community to obtain more information from CRAs about their practices in light of their perceived role in the financial crisis.

The paper covers data required for general monitoring of CRAs, as well as potential investigatory activities should a breach be suspected, but it does not cover data required during the registration process. These firms will have to provide operational data such as ratings updates (including withdrawals), new issuances, methodologies reviews, internal control reviews, financial data and information on staff turnover to regulators on a monthly basis. Compliance data, including updated work plans, identification and mitigation of potential conflicts of interests or breaches, compliance reports and internal audit or risk reports produced by the CRA, will be required on a monthly or quarterly basis, depending on the size of the firm.

CESR is being rather prescriptive about the data it is requiring these firms to provide to their national regulators in order to ensure that full transparency is achieved. It is also mandating on site visits by home and host regulators to these individual firms in order to ensure they are kept in line and living up to their purported risk management practices. “The number and frequency of meetings should be proportionate to the size and structure of a CRA, whether it is part of a group, as well as on individual circumstances,” notes CESR.

CESR is keen for ratings agencies and market participants to provide feedback on whether these requirements are practical and will provide enough transparency into the practices of the much maligned CRAs. The European approach is also similar to that being adopted in the US by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which earlier this year issued a set of proposals following a regulatory roundtable on the subject of CRAs.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: ESG data sourcing and management to meet your ESG strategy, objectives and timeline

ESG data plays a key role in research, fund product development, fund selection, asset selection, performance tracking, and client and regulatory reporting, yet it is not always easy to source and manage in a complete, transparent and timely manner. This webinar will review the state-of-play on ESG data, consider the challenges of sourcing and managing...

BLOG

GLEIF Adds Delhi-based MNS Credit Management to LEI Validation Agent Network

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) has added MNS Credit Management Group (MNS) as a Validation Agent in the Global LEI System. This brings the number of agents able to obtain and maintain LEIs for their clients to more than 10 worldwide. MNS will work as a Validation Agent for Legal Entity Identifier India,...

EVENT

ESG Data & Tech Summit London

The ESG Data & Tech Summit will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.

GUIDE

What the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Will Mean for Your Firm

It’s hard to believe that as early as the 2009 Group of 20 summit in Pittsburgh the industry had recognised the need for greater transparency as part of a wider package of reforms aimed at mitigating the systemic risk posed by the OTC derivatives market. That realisation ultimately led to the Dodd Frank Act, and...