About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Blockchain Could Shorten Settlement Time, Paxos Exec Says

Subscribe to our newsletter

Another frontier for application of blockchain distributed ledger technology could be shortening the settlement cycle for trades, says an executive at Paxos, the blockchain technology company that completed a pilot program with Euroclear in December for gold transaction settlement.

Paxos is planning to roll out its gold transaction settlement capabilities more widely in 2017, building on its Euroclear Bankchain effort, according to Rajesh Nair, vice president of engineering at Paxos. More broadly, blockchain can disrupt middle and back office functions, not just front-office and trading functions, adds Nair.

“T+3 [trade date plus three] settlement means you’re locking up all the capital for three days,” he says. “When you do instantaneous settlement, you unlock all that capital. … The fact that we still need three days to settle a trade is just not sustainable as a processing constant. We’re striving for near real-time settlement. If we’re highly successful at what we’re trying to do, then as a first a trade and the settlement will be the same day. The endgame is to say the trade and settlement are the same thing.”

By creating a delivery-versus-payment transaction and record that is agreed upon by both parties to a transaction, reconciliations become unnecessary, explains Nair. “Blockchain enables you to skip reconciliations, because you have a copy of that same database that everybody has,” he says. “So there are no reconciliation costs. Blockchain itself reconciles everything. That has the potential to reduce a whole slew of costs from the back office.”

Paxos’ Bankchain service is built to be interoperable through APIs or FIX and Swift connections. Paxos has a market advisory group in which users (including some Tier 1 firms) provide feedback on its services. “They can advise us what’s wrong with it and see how it integrates with existing systems,” says Nair. “We use the feedback to refine the product.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: GenAI and LLM case studies for Surveillance, Screening and Scanning

As Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) move from pilot to production, compliance, surveillance, and screening functions are seeing tangible results – and new risks. From trade surveillance to adverse media screening to policy and regulatory scanning, GenAI and LLMs promise to tackle complexity and volume at a scale never seen before. But...

BLOG

Democratising Surveillance: Why Culture Is the Real Compliance Challenge

Institutional culture has always been the defining constraint for effective compliance across capital markets and treasury. Boards may approve ever-larger budgets for surveillance technology and artificial intelligence, and regulators may intensify scrutiny of governance, risk, and compliance frameworks, yet the hardest variable to control remains behavioural norms and internal incentives. For many organisations, the question...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

ESG Data Handbook 2022

The ESG landscape is changing faster than anyone could have imagined even five years ago. With tens of trillions of dollars expected to have been committed to sustainable assets by the end of the decade, it’s never been more important for financial institutions of all sizes to stay abreast of changes in the ESG data...