About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Benchmarking the Benchmarks

Subscribe to our newsletter

In the world of low latency, it seems that benchmarks are headline news. Having readily available figures showing xxx microseconds and yyy hundreds of thousands of updates per second is a pretty sure way to get some press coverage for one’s product. Indeed, I find myself asking of vendors who are pushing their new datafeed handler, or complex event processing engine, “So, got any benchmarks for it?”

Until recently, the only game in town for benchmarks was Peter Lankford’s imposingly named (and cleverly named) Securities Technology Analysis Center (Stac), which makes a business out of running independent benchmarks for vendors, detailing the exact software and hardware components (or stack) used in the benchmark test.

Of course, while Stac is independent, not all of the benchmarks it runs are published. If the results don’t stack up so well (excuse the pun), then the vendor sponsoring the benchmark isn’t likely to make them public. So the news from Stac, while authentic and useful, is really just the good news. Indeed, Stac’s Lankford does point out that the published benchmarks should augment, not replace, specific benchmarks conducted by end users.

Intel has now come on stream with its own Low Latency Lab, with StreamBase partner Datastream Analysis making use of it to benchmark calculations for algorithmic trading. Again, useful data to have. But since the lab is there to assist partners in porting their applications to the Intel architecture, one expects that any published results will show such endevours in good light.

It’s probably a pipe dream to expect any independent body to emerge that will really shake down low latency components and publish the results – the good, the bad and the ugly. For one thing, I suspect that support from vendors would be difficult to obtain.

But perhaps the next step might be the creation of some common benchmark standards, with input from financial markets practitioners, that would allow vendors, independent testers and end users to perform and compare results. Useful, and newsworthy, no?

Until next time … here’s some good music.

[tags]stac,securities technology analysis center,intel,data stream analysis,dsal,benchmarks[/tags]

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

Date: 7 May 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional...

BLOG

Data as a Product: From Collection to Control in Modern Markets

For much of the past decade, data strategy in capital markets focused on accumulation. Firms invested heavily in market data feeds, alternative datasets, data lakes, and analytics platforms. Yet despite this abundance, many organisations have still struggled to answer basic operational questions with confidence, particularly during periods of market stress. The problem is no longer...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, Spring, New York, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 9th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions Europe 2010

The European corporate actions market could be the stage of some pretty heavy duty discussions regarding standards going forward, particularly with regards to the adoption of both XBRL tagging and ISO 20022 messaging. The region’s issuer community, for one, is not going to be easy to convince of the benefits of XBRL tags, given the...