About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A Tower of Babel for Risk Data

Subscribe to our newsletter

There’s nothing better than a good analogy and this week’s JWG organised panel discussion on the topic of funds transfer pricing (FTP) saw one of the banking industry panellists (Chatham House rules prevent me from naming names) come up with a particularly good (if well used) description of the risk data challenge as one in which firms are striving to build a “Tower of Babel”. The panellist spoke about his own firm’s attempts to develop such a structure (bespoke, in-house rather than vendor bought) in order to be able to aggregate data relevant to risk management from across its siloed legacy systems architectures.

The Tower of Babel analogy has been used in a number of different data management contexts of late, not least of which has been by the European Central Bank’s (ECB) statistics division director general Francis Gross to describe a reference data utility, and it seems that firms are keenly aware of the value of an over-arching structure via which to pool vital data components. Enterprise risk management is predicated on the ability to gather these data sets together in a timely fashion and put them through their paces, after all. That was certainly the message repeated by panellists at our own A-Team Insight Exchange events last month.

However, such an endeavour is no mean feat. The panellist at the JWG event indicated his firm has been working on the project for 18 months already and progress has been slow and arduous. This could be partially explained perhaps by the fact the firm has decided to tackle data relating to the hardest instruments first: the derivatives book.

Another panellist at the JWG event added that his team has been focusing its work on the liquidity risk management space since early 2007 and has yet to find a “magic formula”, other than chipping away at the problem. The increased time pressure from regulators for the production of reports has also meant the “machine has had to be streamlined” by considering a simplification of certain data flows, he said.

A vendor panellist noted the need for risk teams to be able to provide their boards, in light of the new governance requirements coming down the pipe from the Basel Committee (see more below), with the “right information” rather than drowning them in raw data. The UK Financial Services Authority’s Prudential Risk Division director Colin Lawrence also discussed the need for aggregated but sufficiently granular data in order for the right level of transparency to be achieved.

In fact, the Basel Committee’s most recent paper on “Principles for enhancing corporate governance” refers directly to this data aggregation challenge for risk management teams in compiling reports for their boards. “In ensuring that the board and senior management are sufficiently informed, management and those responsible for the control functions should strike a balance between communicating information that is accurate and “unfiltered” (ie that does not hide potentially bad news) and not communicating so much extraneous information that the sheer volume of information becomes counterproductive,” states the paper.

As noted by one of the panellists, in order to achieve this, standards for accuracy and completeness of data (otherwise known as a data quality framework) are needed, and fast. That will mean the difference between a Towel of Babble and a Tower of Babel.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing Off-Channel Communications Compliance

Managing off-channel communications – business interactions occurring outside of approved corporate systems – continues to challenge firms’ compliance efforts. The rise of personal messaging apps, social media, and other unmonitored channels – for example, messaging functionality embedded in an order management system – exposes firms to substantial regulatory risk. Enforcement actions by regulatory bodies, such...

BLOG

Compliance Innovation at Droit: Bridging Symbolic Logic and GenAI

Compliance teams frequently face overwhelming regulatory shifts like those imposed by MiFID II or EMIR Refit. For many firms, understanding exactly how a new mandate impacts day-to-day operations can feel overwhelming – unless, of course, you can assess the operational impacts and immediately trace those mandates back to the source text itself. Since its founding...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

The DORA Implementation Playbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Demonstrating Resilience Beyond the Deadline

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) has fundamentally reshaped the European Union’s financial regulatory landscape, with its full application beginning on January 17, 2025. This regulation goes beyond traditional risk management, explicitly acknowledging that digital incidents can threaten the stability of the entire financial system. As the deadline has passed, the focus is now shifting...