About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A-Team Webinar Discusses Outstanding Pain Points of Solvency II Compliance

Subscribe to our newsletter

The January 2016 deadline for Solvency II compliance passed without major incident, but looks like the end of the beginning with most insurance companies and asset managers making the deadline, but many continuing to work on aspects of the regulation not only to ensure compliance, but also to improve operational efficiency, reduce costs and gain competitive advantage.

The state of play on Solvency II, manual workarounds employed in the rush to compliance, and outstanding challenges that once resolved will smooth the compliance process were discussed during this week’s A-Team Group webinar covering the run-up to Solvency II compliance and the pain points still to be tackled. The webinar was moderated by A-Team Group chief content officer Andrew Delaney and joined by Volker Lainer, vice president of product management at GoldenSource; Lowell Fryman, practice principal at Collibra; and Hubert Deroubaix, head of European regulatory products at Interactive Data.

The webinar participants agreed that while insurers met the compliance deadline, their methods varied greatly and many are now working to streamline Solvency II processes to reduce the cost of compliance. Manual collection and aggregation of data for Solvency II look-through and reporting needs to be automated, CIC and Nace codes need clarification – although these codes did not prove as problematic as first expected – and effective data management and governance programmes must be established to ensure the right data is identified and managed for compliance and, longer term, the benefit of the business.

On a more positive note, the webinar speakers said the tripartite template provides good, but not complete, guidance on the data needed for Solvency II look-through, and that the need for insurers to build robust internal data management frameworks to achieve compliance should allow them to revisit relationships with asset managers, weed out any disadvantageous arrangements, reduce capital requirements and improve competitive stance.

To find out more about:

  • Levels of compliance with Solvency II
  • Solutions for outstanding pain points
  • Implementing data governance
  • Benefits of Solvency II compliance

Listen to the A-Team Group webinar here.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Unpacking Stablecoin Challenges for Financial Institutions

The stablecoin market is experiencing unprecedented growth, driven by emerging regulatory clarity, technological maturity, and rising global demand for a faster, more secure financial infrastructure. But with opportunity comes complexity, and a host of challenges that financial institutions need to address before they can unlock the promise of a more streamlined financial transaction ecosystem. These...

BLOG

Arcesium Warns of Data Crunch as US Pension Funds Boost Private Market Bets

Blackstone’s launch of a business unit dedicated to the creation of products that give US pension funds access to private markets has raised the data challenge for many established investment managers. Blackstone is seeking to win pension trustees over to an investment space they had traditionally been wary of or have been restricted from entering...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

Hosted/Managed Services

The on-site data management model is broken. Resources have been squeezed to breaking point. The industry needs a new operating model if it is truly to do more with less. Can hosted/managed services provide the answer? Can the marketplace really create and maintain a utility-based approach to reference data management? And if so, how can...