The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Best Execution: Putting your Worst Foot Forward?

By Justin Lyon, Founder and CEO of Simudyne.

Increased regulatory pressure has raised the bar for both sell-side brokers and investment managers. In Europe, MiFID II increased responsibility on sell-side firms, with the directive ratcheting up the prevention, detection and containment of algorithms that might behave in an unintended manner and contribute to disorderly trading conditions.

Woven through all of this are the many regulatory challenges that the execution desk faces, with algo performance striking at the heart of the impact of the market structure changes wrought by MIFID II and other regulations.

A new regulatory landscape

We recently surveyed 15 sell-side executives involved in algo trading to establish the effects of these changes as part of our recent whitepaper, Delivering Algo Performance through Enhanced Market Simulation.

According to the survey results, MiFID II’s RTS 6 is viewed as a significant challenge, cited by 36% of respondents. RTS 6 specifies the organisational requirements of investment firms engaged in algorithmic trading, including the testing of algos, the presence of risk and controls, as well as governance processes, and controls and monitoring to prevent algo tools from disrupting orderly markets. The unbundling of research and execution (9%) and the implementation of trade surveillance (9%) were viewed as important regulatory challenges.

Many respondents cited other challenges posed by the new regulatory landscape, among them:

  • Managing for the changing liquidity landscape and calibrating algorithms accordingly. “Suddenly you now have certain orders that you cannot send to certain venues under certain circumstances,” said one executive. “And then you have clients opting out of venues and all that stuff… the impact of all that choice has been huge.”
  • Keeping up with what will be required for Brexit, which will depend on the form that this takes. For example, a hard Brexit could impact where certain equities are traded.
  • The US SEC’s Rule 606 reporting. “These requirements are just bad, they are more convoluted than they should be”, said one respondent.
  • Reporting requirements under best execution are burdensome for some respondents.

Although these challenges may have had their origins in regulatory changes in both the EU and the US, the business impacts have been enormous.

For example, MiFID II has completely changed the market’s approaches to algorithmic trading as a result of the new algo testing requirements, more rigorous best execution rules and transparency requirements, and the emergence of the algo wheel. In this environment, sell-side firms are seeking to be more competitively nimble through new algorithms. However, these same regulations can make the launch or re-tuning of algorithms more operationally challenging than in the past.

A new approach to algo testing

While the sell-side has a regulatory responsibility to properly test its algorithms, there is also a business case in providing innovative tools to measure performance transparency on behalf of the buy-side, enabling it to meet internal compliance guidelines.

Agent-based simulation allows banks to offer more transparency to clients and regulators. Using simulation, they can demonstrate to regulators that they have tested their algos in a broad range of environments and prove that their algos won’t contribute towards disorderly market conditions.

Like an ‘algo-gym’, agent-based simulations can help ensure execution algorithms are ready to be deployed in as wide a range of potential futures as possible. Rather than training algos by looking purely at the ‘surface’ data – the ‘real’ historical data produced by exchanges and other trading venues – agent-based simulations can re-create the data-generating process, producing synthetic market data that is indistinguishable from a given real-world time series.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Trade surveillance: Deploying monitoring and surveillance capabilities for today’s new normal

Let’s face it: The old ways aren’t coming back. A plethora of challenges brought on by the covid-19 pandemic, coupled with unrelenting market volatility and uncertainty, have pushed financial service firms to look for rigorous monitoring and surveillance solutions to meet the demands of the emerging trading landscape. Working from home (WFH) has increased the...

BLOG

Streams: The Way to Better Liquidity in the FX Markets

By Phil Weisberg, EVP of Strategic Planning and Partnerships, oneZero. Sourcing liquidity in foreign exchange trading is a herculean task for banks, one not helped by an ever-evolving thicket of global regulation and the complicated nature of FX infrastructure and trading. The traditional way of looking at how to provide the necessary liquidity has been...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit Virtual

TradingTech Summit (TTS) Virtual will look at how trading technology operations can capitalise on recent disruption and leverage technology to find efficiencies in the new normal environment. The crisis has highlighted that the future is digital and cloud based, and the ability to innovate faster and at scale has become critical. As we move into recovery and ‘business as usual’, what changes and technology innovations should the industry adopt to simplify operations and to support speed, agility and flexibility in trading operations.

GUIDE

Connecting to Today’s Fast Markets

At the same time, the growth of high frequency and event-driven trading techniques is spurring demand for direct feed services sourced from exchanges and other trading venues, including alternative trading systems and multilateral trading facilities. Handling these high-speed data feeds its presenting market data managers and their infrastructure teams with a challenge: how to manage...