The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Associations Warn of Harmful Effects of Extra-territoriality

Eight global and regional trade associations today called on regulators to intensify cooperation to prevent, alleviate or limit the harmful effect of overlap, inconsistency and ambiguity resulting from extra-territoriality in regulatory efforts to implement G20 commitments. Extra-territoriality is a fundamental concern in derivatives business, where it is common for counterparties based in different parts of the world to transact with each other. The associations urge policymakers to consult with each other in formation of legislation, and to resolve differences in the course of implementation of legislation. They further ask regulators to ensure that reform of the international financial regulatory system is based on consistency of approach and on mutual recognition. Harmful effects of a failure to address this concern, cited by the associations, include

  • A more fragmented view of financial market activity making it difficult for regulators to prevent build-up and concentration of systemic risk.
  • Legal uncertainty for internationally-active firms, giving rise to further risk.
  • Greater costs for internationally-active firms and their clients, making for higher financing costs for the wider economy.
  • Negative impacts on investment and employment levels.

The eight associations signing the letter are: the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA), the European Banking Association (EBF), the Futures and Options Association (FOA), the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA), the Investment Management Association (IMA), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), the London Energy Brokers’ Association (LEBA) and the Wholesale Market Brokers’ Association (WMBA).   The letter cites examples of extra-territoriality concerns, such as: 

  • Licensing, authorisation or registration rules;
  • Potential overlap and conflict in regulation of derivatives market participants in foreign jurisdictions;
  • Discrimination in dealing with sovereigns;
  • Rules for CCPs;
  • Trade repositories.

The full text of the letter is available on the Associations’ websites.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Brexit: Reviewing the regulatory landscape and the data management response

With Brexit behind us and the UK establishing its own regulatory regime having failed to reach equivalence with the EU, financial firms face challenges of double reporting, uncertainty about UK regulation, and a potential exodus of top talent. The data management response is not easy and could stretch some firms to the limit as they...

BLOG

DSB Publishes UPI Implementation Timeline, Lists Products Requiring Identifier, Opens Second Fee Model Consultation

The Derivatives Service Bureau (DSB) has taken three more significant steps towards go live of the Unique Product Identifier (UPI) service in July 2022 with the publication of a draft implementation timeline, an initial list of products that will require UPIs and a second UPI fee model industry consultation focusing on the timeline and encouraging...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York City

Now in its 5th year, the RegTech Summit in NYC explores how the North American financial services industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Entity Data Management Handbook – Seventh Edition

Sourcing entity data and ensuring efficient and effective entity data management is a challenge for many financial institutions as volumes of data rise, more regulations require entity data in reporting, and the fight again financial crime is escalated by bad actors using increasingly sophisticated techniques to attack processes and systems. That said, based on best...