About a-team Marketing Services
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Another Take On Market Data Latency Disparities

Subscribe to our newsletter

There’s been a fair amount of media coverage resulting from the recent $5 million fine levied by the Securities and Exchange Commission on NYSE Euronext, caused in the most part by the exchange’s failure to provide data to third parties as quickly as it did to its own data feeds. Now, not to make light of this breakdown in regulatory compliance and market fairness, but the problems did take place between 2008 and 2010, when they were fixed (so we are told). So I can’t say I got too excited when the settlement happened. But it did get me thinking … about a chat I had the other week with Gnodal’s CEO Bob Fernander.

I was really just getting an update from Bob on Gnodal – a network switch vendor with a very low-latency and low congestion product – and listening to his views on store-and-forward vs cut-through switches, when the conversation turned to how trading firms looking to get the very best latency from liquidity venues seek to hook into the fastest port on a network switch.

Says Bob: “Traders fight to the death to be on port 1, not port 26 on the same switch.  Because the guy on port 26 will get his pricing consistently later than the guy on port 1. And the guy on port 1 has a consistent advantage if he’s got a real efficient execution engine and he’s simply updating his execution. Inside that switch, it gets the data to the port at different times.”

So how much of an issue is this?  Is anything being done to resolve it? There’s more on this (and on cut-through) from Bob on Gnodal’s own blog here. But do give me your own thoughts – comments welcome below!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Deploying market infrastructure managed services

Date: 25 May 2022 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Traditionally, trading organisations have procured and managed hardware themselves or through a third-party to support data services in a hosted environment – but as large firms look for efficiencies and smaller firms seek external help so they can focus...

BLOG

Sponsored Blog: What Market Data Strategy Challenges Does the Buy-Side Face?

By Janelle Veasey, Head of Real-Time, Refinitiv, an LSEG business and John Mason, Group Head of Pricing Reference Services, Refinitiv, an LSEG business Although the new Refinitiv Connected Data survey shows that buy-side firms are making more progress on their digital transformation journeys than sell-side firms, the evolution of their market and reference data strategies...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City (Redirected)

Now in its 8th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in NYC explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

Connecting to Today’s Fast Markets

At the same time, the growth of high frequency and event-driven trading techniques is spurring demand for direct feed services sourced from exchanges and other trading venues, including alternative trading systems and multilateral trading facilities. Handling these high-speed data feeds its presenting market data managers and their infrastructure teams with a challenge: how to manage...