About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

All Along the Watchtower: How MiFID II’s Impact on the Front Office Is Driving Banks to Mutualise

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Dan Barnes

Bob Dylan’s lyric, ‘There’s too much confusion, I can’t get no relief,’ resonates in the world of capital markets. It encapsulates the relentless regulatory and systemic turbulence.

Under the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) coming into force in 2018, firms active in Europe will be hit with many new layers of process over existing mechanisms and completely new activities.

Project Sentinel is intended to reduce the challenge this presents for banks in the over-the-counter (OTC) front office. OTC trading was virtually absent from the first MiFID in 2007 and its inclusion in the 2018 directive expands the rules to capture a range of instruments and activities.

“Sentinel is very focussed on leveraging open standards to allow interoperability of components within Sentinel and components that banks have in their existing systems,” says Sassan Danesh, managing partner at Etrading Software, which is running the project on behalf of the banks.

It intends to develop shared technologies that at once provide sell-side firms with a resource that can assist in MiFID II compliance while mutualising the cost of compliance. The group recently announced that membership had grown to 10 sell-side firms.

Fred Ponzo, managing partner at consultancy GreySpark Partners. “The really big banks have the economies of scale to make the investment to comply with MiFID II pay off; the smaller firms they are really struggling. Therefore, sharing the overhead across three or four would be advantageous, across 10 will clearly help.”

The potential of the model is not lost, even on larger firms. Mark Goodman, head of foreign exchange, rates and credit (FRC) direct execution services at UBS says, “Sentinel certainly has some value in the mutualisation of cost in the face of regulation. We aren’t part of it but we certainly keep an eye on it to see what it might do for us. We see cost pressures increasing on the sell side, we see increasing cooperation around ‘utility functions’ that do not offer a competitive advantage.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

Date: 7 May 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional...

BLOG

UK Equity Consolidated Tape and EU MiFIR – Two Data Regimes, One Control Problem

The UK’s proposed equity consolidated tape is framed as a response to long-standing fragmentation in equity market data. By aggregating post-trade information and an attributed best bid and offer across trading venues, the tape is intended to provide a single, standardised view of UK equity trading. At the same time, transaction reporting under the Markets...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Managing Valuations Data for Optimal Risk Management

The US corporate actions market has long been characterised as paper-based and manually intensive, but it seems that much progress is being made of late to tackle the lack of automation due to the introduction of four little letters: XBRL. According to a survey by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and standards...