About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

All Along the Watchtower: How MiFID II’s Impact on the Front Office Is Driving Banks to Mutualise

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Dan Barnes

Bob Dylan’s lyric, ‘There’s too much confusion, I can’t get no relief,’ resonates in the world of capital markets. It encapsulates the relentless regulatory and systemic turbulence.

Under the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) coming into force in 2018, firms active in Europe will be hit with many new layers of process over existing mechanisms and completely new activities.

Project Sentinel is intended to reduce the challenge this presents for banks in the over-the-counter (OTC) front office. OTC trading was virtually absent from the first MiFID in 2007 and its inclusion in the 2018 directive expands the rules to capture a range of instruments and activities.

“Sentinel is very focussed on leveraging open standards to allow interoperability of components within Sentinel and components that banks have in their existing systems,” says Sassan Danesh, managing partner at Etrading Software, which is running the project on behalf of the banks.

It intends to develop shared technologies that at once provide sell-side firms with a resource that can assist in MiFID II compliance while mutualising the cost of compliance. The group recently announced that membership had grown to 10 sell-side firms.

Fred Ponzo, managing partner at consultancy GreySpark Partners. “The really big banks have the economies of scale to make the investment to comply with MiFID II pay off; the smaller firms they are really struggling. Therefore, sharing the overhead across three or four would be advantageous, across 10 will clearly help.”

The potential of the model is not lost, even on larger firms. Mark Goodman, head of foreign exchange, rates and credit (FRC) direct execution services at UBS says, “Sentinel certainly has some value in the mutualisation of cost in the face of regulation. We aren’t part of it but we certainly keep an eye on it to see what it might do for us. We see cost pressures increasing on the sell side, we see increasing cooperation around ‘utility functions’ that do not offer a competitive advantage.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional “Buy vs. Build” debate, a false dichotomy that oversimplifies the choice between generic, off-the-shelf platforms and...

BLOG

CFTC’s Selig Sets Out Agenda for Leaner Rules and Faster Markets

Michael Selig has placed derivatives regulation at the centre of the US competitiveness agenda, using his keynote at the ISDA annual meeting to call for a more proportionate rulebook, deeper SEC and CFTC alignment, and a clearer path for innovation in swaps, clearing, tokenised collateral and market structure. He framed the CFTC’s task as keeping...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Enterprise Data Management, 2010 Edition

The global regulatory community has become increasingly aware of the data management challenge within financial institutions, as it struggles with its own challenge of better tracking systemic risk across financial markets. The US regulator in particular is seemingly keen to kick off a standardisation process and also wants the regulatory community to begin collecting additional...