The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ABA Commends FASB on Progress But Says More Needs to be Done on OTTI

Following a barrage of criticism from market participants, government figures and regulators alike, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has finally released a number of proposals concerning mark to market accounting rules. The proposals include allowing firms more leeway in determining if a market is active and whether a transaction is distressed. However, a number of bodies have already criticised the proposals, including the American Bankers Association (ABA), which says more guidance is needed, especially in the area of other than temporary impairment (OTTI).

While we are encouraged by today’s action, we believe that the proposal does not adequately address problems with OTTI, which is critically important and has been extremely controversial for many years. Specifically, losses recorded in capital should be based on economic losses rather than market losses,” the association said in a statement.

The association believes that problems with mark to market accounting have needlessly exacerbated the current economic crisis and resulted in the loss of billions of dollars in capital and therefore FASB needs to do as much as it can to improve matters.

“ABA has called for improved mark to market accounting guidance in time for companies to use it when preparing their first quarter financial reports, and we are pleased that FASB is acting a timely fashion. While we welcome today’s news, it will be important to look at the details of the written proposal to see how fully it improves the guidance. It will also be imperative to examine the practical effect the proposal will have based on the various ways it is interpreted,” the statement concludes.

ABA issued a similar statement last month, with a view to prompting further action by the FASB, but it seems that the accounting trade body has yet again failed to satisfactorily deal with the issues raised.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing the transaction reporting landscape post Brexit: MiFID II, SFTR, EMIR

The transaction reporting landscape has, for many financial institutions, expanded considerably in size since the end of the UK’s Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 and the resulting need for double reporting of some transactions to both EU and UK authorities. It has also changed dramatically following the UK government’s failure to reach equivalence...

BLOG

DTCC Increases Transparency of Credit Default Swaps Market with Upgraded CDS Kinetics Platform

DTCC has enhanced its CDS Kinetics data platform to support demand for more transparency into the credit default swaps (CDS) market within the over-the-counter derivatives space. The platform provides position data on CDS sourced from DTCC’s Trade Information Warehouse including notional outstanding, net notional, and trading volume metrics on securities including single-name, index, and index...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York City

Now in its 5th year, the RegTech Summit in NYC explores how the North American financial services industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

ESG Handbook 2021

A-Team Group’s ESG Handbook 2021 is a ‘must read’ for all capital markets participants, data vendors and solutions providers involved in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing and product development. It includes extensive coverage of all elements of ESG, from an initial definition and why ESG is important, to existing and emerging regulations, data challenges...