The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A New Age of Automation For Proxy Voting on Horizon?

Share article

The similarity of the proxy voting process to the corporate actions process has in some ways negatively impacted efforts to automate proxy voting, but a recently initiated pilot of new Swift proxy voting messages could herald in greater efficiencies to the process.

This was the message from Chad Spitler, principal/associate director, corporate governance and proxy at Barclays Global Investors, speaking during the corporate actions focus day preceding FIMA 2006 earlier this month in London.

The problem has been that because the proxy voting process is similar to the corporate actions process, there have been efforts to fit proxy voting into the corporate actions model, but, said Spitler, “it’s just different enough that it doesn’t fit”. With the increasing emphasis on good corporate governance though there is a definite requirement for automation of a process complicated by the involvement of multiple players with multiple roles, and beset by a lack of common definitions, the absence of an audit trail and a proliferation of proprietary systems.

According to Linda Bookheim, senior business manager, North America, Securities Industry Division at Swift, its new proxy voting messages are designed to replace existing agreed market practice for proxy using ISO 15022 messages. “Due to problems with processing the proxies in back office systems, the market recommended we create a set of messages specifically for proxy,” she says. “We have now done that using the ISO 20022 methodology. With the help of industry practitioners we have created eight XML messages covering the entire proxy business flow.” If the pilot currently under way proves a success, the plan is to make the messages live on Swiftnet in Q4 2007.
BGI is involved in the Swift pilot, working with Euroclear and proxy voting solutions provider ADP Investor Communication Services, and Spitler told FIMA delegates the experience of agreeing the new messages was a broadly positive one, though he did say: “I would have added more data elements, but the custodians wouldn’t have any of that!” He confirmed that BGI would be encouraging all its custodians to sign up and start using the Swift proxy voting messages.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to leverage the LIBOR transition to improve your data management game

The transition away from LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) is well underway, but there remains considerable ambiguity around how the final stages will be executed – especially with regards to benchmark replacements in markets outside the UK. What are the options, where are the uncertainties and what stage have firms reached in their preparations? The...

BLOG

Insight: How to Adapt your Data Strategy to Changing Times

As the debut Data Management Summit Europe Virtual from the A-Team Group fast approaches (book your place here), and as the ongoing complexities of operating in a post-COVID 19 world start to become clear, it is imperative that firms evaluate their current approach to data management in order to identify the emerging gaps in their current provision, and...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

The TradingTech Summit in London brings together European senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution and trading architecture to discuss how firms can use high performance technologies to optimise trading in the new regulatory environment.

GUIDE

Alternative Trading Systems Directory 2010

The year since we launched our first edition of the A-Team Alternative Trading Directory has passed by in a flash (no pun intended). And while the rate of expansion of the alternative trading system sector may have slowed – even consolidated somewhat – in the more established centres, their onward march continues both in terms of credibility, and of uptake...