The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A New Age of Automation For Proxy Voting on Horizon?

The similarity of the proxy voting process to the corporate actions process has in some ways negatively impacted efforts to automate proxy voting, but a recently initiated pilot of new Swift proxy voting messages could herald in greater efficiencies to the process.

This was the message from Chad Spitler, principal/associate director, corporate governance and proxy at Barclays Global Investors, speaking during the corporate actions focus day preceding FIMA 2006 earlier this month in London.

The problem has been that because the proxy voting process is similar to the corporate actions process, there have been efforts to fit proxy voting into the corporate actions model, but, said Spitler, “it’s just different enough that it doesn’t fit”. With the increasing emphasis on good corporate governance though there is a definite requirement for automation of a process complicated by the involvement of multiple players with multiple roles, and beset by a lack of common definitions, the absence of an audit trail and a proliferation of proprietary systems.

According to Linda Bookheim, senior business manager, North America, Securities Industry Division at Swift, its new proxy voting messages are designed to replace existing agreed market practice for proxy using ISO 15022 messages. “Due to problems with processing the proxies in back office systems, the market recommended we create a set of messages specifically for proxy,” she says. “We have now done that using the ISO 20022 methodology. With the help of industry practitioners we have created eight XML messages covering the entire proxy business flow.” If the pilot currently under way proves a success, the plan is to make the messages live on Swiftnet in Q4 2007.
BGI is involved in the Swift pilot, working with Euroclear and proxy voting solutions provider ADP Investor Communication Services, and Spitler told FIMA delegates the experience of agreeing the new messages was a broadly positive one, though he did say: “I would have added more data elements, but the custodians wouldn’t have any of that!” He confirmed that BGI would be encouraging all its custodians to sign up and start using the Swift proxy voting messages.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing the transaction reporting landscape post Brexit: MiFID II, SFTR, EMIR

The transaction reporting landscape has, for many financial institutions, expanded considerably in size since the end of the UK’s Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 and the resulting need for double reporting of some transactions to both EU and UK authorities. It has also changed dramatically following the UK government’s failure to reach equivalence...

BLOG

Deadlines and Data Management By-Products of LIBOR Transition

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has published a global transition roadmap for LIBOR that sets out a timetable of actions financial firms should take to ensure a smooth transition from LIBOR to other risk-free rates by the end of 2021. The data management task of transition remains a huge challenge for many firms, but it...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 10th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in NYC explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

What the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Will Mean for Your Firm

It’s hard to believe that as early as the 2009 Group of 20 summit in Pittsburgh the industry had recognised the need for greater transparency as part of a wider package of reforms aimed at mitigating the systemic risk posed by the OTC derivatives market. That realisation ultimately led to the Dodd Frank Act, and...