The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A Lack of Choice

Share article

A dominant theme from this week’s A-Team Group and SmartStream roundtable on data management challenges for the buy side in 2011 was the lack of viable alternatives in the market when it comes to both standards and data management industry groups or associations to join. A case in point was raised by a member of the audience (under Chatham House rules) that there is only one option for classification codes for financial instruments in the market: the Association of National Numbering Agencies’ (ANNA) ISO 18773, otherwise known as the six character Classification of Financial Instrument (CFI) code, which is in draft format at the moment.

The audience member challenged the panel to think of another standard that is already in use that could be used for the purposes of classification, but one didn’t spring to anyone’s mind (myself included). The impetus behind the question was the assertion that the CFI currently falls far short of achieving what it sets out to do: provide a unique classification standard that all parties in the financial markets can use in order to ensure they are all talking about the same class of instrument.

For background purposes: ANNA is working on two new standards in conjunction with each other: ISO 18773 (which is related to abbreviations for financial instruments) and ISO 18774 (otherwise known as the Financial Instrument Short Name, or FISN). The abbreviation standard is aimed at doing what it says on the tin: standardising the industry’s use of instrument abbreviations, which will then be used in the FISN standard. The FISN standard is therefore aimed at uniquely naming a financial instrument by combining an abbreviated issuer name plus some descriptive information about the instrument, such as instrument type, maturity date and interest rate, whereas the CFI code is aimed at identifying the classification of an instrument.

This work has progressed to the final draft stage, although it is uncertain as yet whether ANNA will be the registration authority for these new codes. As for the debate, a number of audience members noted that the CFI in its current form is not doing a good enough job. One elaborated: “Vendors are using different classification codes for the same instrument, so they do not match up when we are processing these instruments.” This indicates that there may be further technical guidance needed in order to ensure reconciliation work is not required to this end. In the meantime and bearing in mind the slow pace of the ISO process, audience members were keen to ascertain whether another option was available. However, the answer, unfortunately, seems to be no. There was also some discussion about the need for a European focused, not for profit lobby group to work on data management standardisation issues, outside of the current limited number of groups and single association (in the form of the EDM Council) in the space.

One attendee noted: “If we don’t want to join the EDM Council, what else is out there to choose from?” Given the desire of a number of industry participants to form a group that is potentially focused on buy side data management concerns, perhaps we’ll see some movement soon to this end? It will certainly give the industry one more option. Look out for our full coverage of the panel discussion at the event soon too…

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Data Standards & Identifiers: Where are they helping and what more can be done?

Beyond regulatory compliance, what are the opportunities for leveraging standards to improve operational efficiencies? Financial institutions are starting to realise there are clear benefits in taking a strategic approach to data standardisation as they move to more data driven approaches which require good quality, accurate data for analytics and AI programmes. This webinar will review...

BLOG

GLEIF Deploys Workiva Platform, Expands into North America

The GLEIF Foundation partnered with XBRL International and Workiva in June 2020 to publish its annual report in both human and machine-readable Inline XBRL and HTML format, with GLEIF’s LEI embedded into the financial information. It constitutes only the second official business report globally to automatically link the filing entity to its verified LEI reference...

EVENT

RegTech Summit Virtual

Regtech Summit Virtual will explore how business and operating models have adapted post COVID and how RegTech can provide agile and enhanced compliance for managing an evolving risk and compliance landscape. As the dust settles, we will look at the outlook for the global RegTech industry, where Regulators are focusing as they get back to business, and deep dive into global regulatory priorities for the rest of the year and into 2021.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2020/2021 – Eighth Edition

This eighth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook is a ‘must-have’ for capital markets participants during this period of unprecedented change. Available free of charge, it profiles every regulation that impacts capital markets data management practices giving you: A detailed overview of each regulation with key dates, data and data management implications, links to...