About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Outside Partnerships Bolster Trade Execution Infrastructures

Subscribe to our newsletter

Partnership is the most important ingredient for optimising the performance of trading infrastructure and reducing its complexity, say operations executives who spoke at the Intelligent Trading Summit in London on 2nd February. Regulatory compliance issues are gaining on cost and value as the biggest consideration, however, according to the executives.

Partnership efforts address the need for collaboration between business, technology, support, infrastructure, quant and sales professionals, according to Richard Bell, UK head of exchange and market access IT at BNP Paribas. “Then you can get a really effective platform that’s not just about making it really fast,” he says. “The partnership model makes it a competitive platform.”

In-house efforts cannot adequately address trading infrastructure challenges, according to Robert Johnson, head of front office solutions, MUFG Securities EMEA. “There are things we can look at to make it less painful, such as open standards,” he says. “We got somewhere with FIX [the trade messaging protocol]. There are lots of other options we can design into our systems.”

Still, outsourcing decisions should be made selectively, according to Benjamin Stephens, head of business development at Instinet Europe. “We do very little outsourcing. We have some feed handlers for market data, but we have to normalize it ourselves anyway,” he says. “We run our own FPGA development teams because we couldn’t find vendors who would do it at a cost that made sense. … We run our own network because we couldn’t find vendors who could actually run a network going several places.

“You can only outsource if you’re outsourcing to someone who knows what they’re doing,” Stephens adds.

Regardless of the cost savings or value benefits that can be derived from partnership or collaboration on improving trading operations, which serve as drivers to implement such efforts, regulatory compliance demands are becoming more important as drivers, explains Johnson of MUFG Securities.

“It’s MiFID II this year, and FRTB this year and next,” he says. “The key for regulation is that it’s an appropriate size solution for the regulation being addressed.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best approaches for trade and transaction reporting

Compliance practitioners and technology leaders in capital markets face mounting pressure to ensure that reporting processes are efficient, accurate, and aligned with global standards. Market developments and jurisdictional nuances in regulatory frameworks like MiFID II, EMIR, SFTR and MAS create a continual challenge for compliance teams. This webinar brings together senior RegTech executives and seasoned...

BLOG

Data Lineage the ‘Heartbeat’ of Financial Institutions: Webinar Review

End-to-end lineage that enables robust data traceability is now considered the “heartbeat of an enterprise” and no longer a niche interest of data managers, according to an A-Team LIVE webinar. Focusing on the importance of metadata to two particular use cases – regulatory compliance and artificial intelligence readiness – panellists agreed that without a solid...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

The DORA Implementation Playbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Demonstrating Resilience Beyond the Deadline

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) has fundamentally reshaped the European Union’s financial regulatory landscape, with its full application beginning on January 17, 2025. This regulation goes beyond traditional risk management, explicitly acknowledging that digital incidents can threaten the stability of the entire financial system. As the deadline has passed, the focus is now shifting...