About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Talking Reference Data with Andrew Delaney: Summer of LEI

Subscribe to our newsletter

Summer – such as it exists here in London – is typically characterised by a slowdown in activity in our marketplace. But we are bracing ourselves for a busy season as the world ponders just how the legal entity identifier (LEI) will look – and how to deal with it once it emerges.

The pace of pronouncements – from the Financial Stability Board (FSB), from Sifma and just last week from Cusip and the national numbering associations – shows no sign of abating. The smart money seems to be shifting weekly, from the DTCC/Sifma ‘centralised’ solution, to the FSB’s ‘decentralised’ solution and on to Cusip’s suggestion of a ‘hybrid centralised/decentralised’ solution.

Whatever next?

We have been watching these developments – and the concurrent discussion of whether the LEI should be a random number or should contain some intelligence to make it more useful and manageable – with keen interest. It’s high time, we concluded, that we published a special report on the topic.

And it will become so.

We are in the process of pulling together expert opinion from the marketplace for a special report we’ll publish in September. Our planned report – What the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Will Mean for Your Firm – will hopefully do what it says on the tin. We’ll be running a webinar/webcast soon after publication as well, to present the key findings and host a broader, live discussion of the topics raised in the report. And if the market calls for it, we’ll think about doing a seminar on the subject.

As you know, expectations for the LEI are high. The industry initiative to develop and promote a standard global legal entity identifier (LEI) is aimed at significantly reducing the opacity associated with complex financial instruments. The lack of clarity around the issuing entities of certain risky securities was widely acknowledged to be a major contributing factor in the 2008 credit crisis.

Practitioners have welcomed the development of the LEI in terms of reduced risk and elimination of duplication of effort across the industry. But many acknowledge that adopting the new identifier will bring a new set of challenges as firms seek to strike a balance between their internal processes and the use of external suppliers’ services.

Our industry briefing will look at the implications of the emerging LEI for financial institutions as they address how to implement the new standard, and offer suggestions on best practices as the LEI becomes available.

If you’re interested in getting involved, get in touch.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: In data we trust – How to ensure high quality data to power AI

Artificial intelligence is increasingly powering financial institutions’ processes and workflows, encompassing all parts of the enterprise from front-office to the back-office. As organisations seek to gain a competitive edge, they are trialling the technology in variety of ways to streamline and empower multiple use cases. Some are further than others along the path to achieving...

BLOG

GLEIF Begins a New Decade in Growth Mode

The Global Legal Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) enters its second decade this month with its novel system of identifiers for everything from companies and their financial instruments to real assets fast becoming a global standard. While the next five years are expected to see yet more entities join the GLEIF’s open data project, the organisation’s immediate...

EVENT

Data Licensing Forum 2025

The Data Licensing Forum will explore industry trends, themes and specific developments relating to licensing of financial market data from Exchanges and Data Vendors.

GUIDE

Applications of Reference Data to the Middle Office

Increasing volumes and the complexity of reference data in the post-crisis environment have left the middle office struggling to meet the requirements of the current market order. Middle office functions must therefore be robust enough to be able to deal with the spectre of globalisation, an increase in the use of esoteric security types and...