About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Virginie’s Blog – Opinions on Xtrakter’s AII Ambitions

Subscribe to our newsletter

Last week, the trade matching and regulatory reporting solution vendor arm of Euroclear Xtrakter marked the official launch of its Alternative Instrument Identifier (AII) compliant transaction reporting solution and indicated that it is hoping to net a significant share of the market (see our coverage of which. However, given initial reader response to the news, Xtrakter should be keeping a close eye on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) in the AII reporting space as a result of its acquisition of the Financial Services Authority’s (FSA) Transaction Reporting System (TRS) earlier this month.

One reader who currently works for a data and solution vendor (and also previously worked for Xtrakter) reckoned that although the firm should not be unduly concerned regarding the AII, it should keep a close eye on its rival in general: “I can see why they (Xtrakter) are not worried about becoming the UK leader in AII reporting, Xtrakter has been ready to process such transaction reports for a long time. With regard to the impact of TRS being acquired by the LSE and migrating and/or integrating this system into UnaVista the results will have to be seen. There may be little impact on Xtrakter, however I do believe the acquisition strengthens UnaVista’s position in this sector.”

Another reader from a global bank noted: “Many banks use a number of Approved Reporting Mechanisms (ARMs) simultaneously to direct their reports to the FSA, typically carving out the choice of ARM by asset class. Especially where no ARMs changes have been made since MiFID 2007. My observations of the banks I’ve seen are that derivatives traffic tends to pass through TRS, so I would not be surprised to find that the AII volumes predominantly pass to the LSE. Watch this space I guess…”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: High noon for surveillance: resolving tension between the costs of false positives, challenges of calibration, and compliance

When it comes to trade surveillance, regulators want firms to do their own alert calibration, examine all alerts, and keep auditable records. Firms need to balance the real cost of false positives with the technical challenge and risk of self-calibrating and auto-calibrating, while compliance, IT and vendors have to grapple with the need for defensible...

BLOG

Bloomberg’s Kate Lee on Regulatory Data as an Operating Layer for Compliance and Reporting

Regulatory data has become a firmly established part of the control architecture of capital markets firms. As transparency rules diverge across the jurisdictions, liquidity monitoring becomes more granular, and supervisors demand stronger evidence of how figures are derived, firms are obligated to treat regulatory datasets as governed, versioned and explainable operating assets. In this Q&A...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, London, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 8th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...